• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hacker group anonymous claims the shooter of Michael Brown will not be charged

22 years ago. In the biggest miscarriage of justice in my memory.

You want riots. You want unrest. So you can self-backpat and claim you were right about "those people."

Yea, well 'those people' do a wonderful job in acting like undisciplined morons in causing destruction and hurting people and businesses.

Funny how they first loot electronic stores, getting high-end equipment for themselves first.

They deserve the full measure of law enforcement for their illegal actions.

There is no excuse for their actions.
 
Yea, well 'those people' do a wonderful job in acting like undisciplined morons in causing destruction and hurting people and businesses.

Funny how they first loot electronic stores, getting high-end equipment for themselves first.

They deserve the full measure of law enforcement for their illegal actions.

There is no excuse for their actions.

Who are "they"?
 
Yeah right....

Then why the **** do you defend obviously Orwellian psycho's?

What "Orwellian psychos" am I defending here? Take me down that rabbit hole.
 
What "Orwellian psychos" am I defending here? Take me down that rabbit hole.

Well you seem to have a habit of defending every progressive scrutinized...
 
Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.

Sometimes, it's like some of you WANT riots.
I don't 'want' anything. I was quoting the OP. I didn't use the phrase "those people," you did. So you are 0 for 2.
 
Remember when "those people" rioted after the Zimmerman verdict?

I don't either.

Sometimes, it's like some of you WANT riots.
Your comment isn't even relevant.
There wasn't major demonstrations and rioting by idiots before Zimmerman was charged or prior to his trial.

Those idiots against him were distributed across the country. And some even acted out violently against white folks, before and after the verdict, proudly declaring that their crimes were done for Trayvon. Some still do.

Even some of the current bunch of idiots have said their rioting and demonstrations are for both Brown and Trayvon.

But unlike Zimmerman's case, this case has rioting and demonstrations before it has even revealed if he will be charged with a crime, with promises of more if they do not get what they want.
Under those circumstances it is more likely than not that they will at least attempt, if not simply continue the activities they have already engaged in.
 
Any of these morons who riot, of course.

I'm certainly not justifying rioting. But I think we know who a few posters here are rooting for to get very, very angry.
 
That's not an answer.

Yeah it is an answer when you claim you're not a progressive yet have a habit of defending progressives, by attacking me and everyone who questions progressives.
 
Yeah it is an answer when you claim you're not a progressive yet have a habit of defending progressives, by attacking me and everyone who questions progressives.

I "attack" you because I find your views abhorrent and your posting style grating.

You, like most people who incessantly rail about "progressives," have a very loose definition for that term -- a definition that covers basically anyone to the left of, well, you.
 
I "attack" you because I find your views abhorrent and your posting style grating.

You, like most people who incessantly rail about "progressives," have a very loose definition for that term -- a definition that covers basically anyone to the left of, well, you.

There is no "loose" definition - there is only one. And in present day "progress" in political terms equates to socialism, government and redistribution of wealth.

I never made that **** up - your progressive pals did....

Of course you don't ****ing know because you get your news from the progressive MSM - as if they will ever tell you the truth.
 
There is no "loose" definition - there is only one. And in present day "progress" in political terms equates to socialism, government and redistribution of wealth.

I never made that **** up - your progressive pals did....

Of course you don't ****ing know because you get your news from the progressive MSM - as if they will ever tell you the truth.

You seem to know an awful lot about where I get my information, a subject I've never broached with you.

You claiming I am a "progressive" is proof positive that you haven't the foggiest idea what "progressive" means. You just use it as an epithet. But it's not the rhetorical "I-win" button you think it is. In fact, it just makes you look ignorant.
 
You seem to know an awful lot about where I get my information, a subject I've never broached with you.

You claiming I am a "progressive" is proof positive that you haven't the foggiest idea what "progressive" means. You just use it as an epithet. But it's not the rhetorical "I-win" button you think it is. In fact, it just makes you look ignorant.

Your regurgitation of your ethics is enough for me to understand where you get your news from.
 
Your regurgitation of your ethics is enough for me to understand where you get your news from.

Anyone else want to take a stab at what the **** this guy is yammering on about?
 
Anyone else want to take a stab at what the **** this guy is yammering on about?

In short you're ****ed and have nothing else to say.
 
Grand Jury's verdict was to be expected sometime "next month" (November), so again the expected timing isn't really new. What about after November 4? November 1 and 2 fall on the weekend, so no Grand Jury decision is likely then. That leaves 28 days for November and 26 (93%) fall after November 4. Therefore, there is a very high probability that the decision would be released after November 4.

CNN is reporting the decision is expected next week..> If they listen to the schools, who don't want their students in danger of being in school when the announcement is read, it may be this weekend. We'll see
 
CNN is reporting the decision is expected next week..> If they listen to the schools, who don't want their students in danger of being in school when the announcement is read, it may be this weekend. We'll see

I'm guessing end of next week.
 
CNN is reporting the decision is expected next week..> If they listen to the schools, who don't want their students in danger of being in school when the announcement is read, it may be this weekend. We'll see

IMO, the authorities should be prepared for a possible violent situation (even if it does not materialize). That past protests were characterized by periodic violence and that numerous protesters are from outside the Ferguson area (having fewer vested stakes in the community and its welfare), one can't discount the risk of violence when it comes to planning.
 
What "Orwellian psychos" am I defending here? Take me down that rabbit hole.

That's a modern retelling of The Monkey's Paw right there.
 
Pretty sad that it takes war-like preparations to deal with the expected actions of people who don't care a lick to consider the merits of the decision.
 
Anyone else want to take a stab at what the **** this guy is yammering on about?
As far as I can tell, he wants to get banned from DP.
 
Appears to be more details from Anonymous here:

Michael Brown Grand Jury Leaks: No Indictment Of Darren Wilson, Anonymous Claims

“Last night we announced that we have received over the past several days a series of leaks from two separate and unrelated sources regarding the long awaited Grand Jury decision regarding the murder of Mike Brown by Ferguson PD Officer Darren Wilson. In our opinion after careful analysis the sources are reliable, and the information we are about to reveal is true. Both sources are government employees with access to both internal government as well as confidential police communications. For reasons of safety we will not be revealing anything further on either our sources or the material leaked to us.”

“On or about November 10, 2014 the Grand Jury decision will be announced. Darren Wilson will NOT be indicted on ANY charges related to the murder of Mike Brown. All local police Chiefs and jail commanders have been notified to begin preparing for major civil unrest. Governor Nixon has been notified of the impending announcement and has ordered the Missouri National Guard to begin preparations for a possible re-enstatement of the martial law that was declared at the beginning of the Ferguson protests.”
 
Back
Top Bottom