As you were told.
Originally Posted by 1750Texan
Originally Posted by mike2810
It is what happens when thugs bite off more than they can chew.
Originally Posted by justabubba
You are speaking utter nonsense.
No, his discharge was not for racial bigotry. That is your bigotry speaking.
His discharge was because his job no longer existed because the Department was disbanded.
Why it was disbanded was not attributable to him. And he had a clean record at that department.
That is a ridiculously absurd claim.
Originally Posted by JC_CT
You do understand that the interviews came before this testimony, right?
You do understand that it is reported that he said during interviews that he did not remember, right?
You do understand that other witnesses have him telling Brown to stop before turning, right?
You do understand that the GJ testimony came after his interviews, right?
Interviews ~ didn't remember
After interviews ~ remembered
During GJ testimony ~ relayed what he remembered
So how is it that you do not understand that him remembering what happened (especially as it was witnessed by others) prior to testifying to the GJ allowed him to testify to such?
That is how things work with memory, or did you also not know that?
And yet you want to call it a lie. That is just stupid.
And what is funny about this is your focus on something that is completely irrelevant.
Whether or not he remembered makes absolutely no difference to what happened prior to Brown turning, or after he turned and began approaching him.