• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

South Carolina Supreme Court Halts Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

Nope you are free to have the OPINION same sex is wrong, you are free to have the OPINION that homoexuality is a sin. What you want to do is make your opinion law to where you DENY a choice for homosexuals to get married. That is where people fight your views and the anti-SSm crowd is LOSING, thank GOD!

Nope? LOL. There has been nothing BUT bigotry from the homosexual marriage advocates over this.
 
Nope? LOL. There has been nothing BUT bigotry from the homosexual marriage advocates over this.

Oh yeah, you are SOOOOOO persecuted. :lamo Here, let me get a tissue so you can dry your tears of persecution

Here's the facts.

YOU want to deny the right for homosexuals to marry, BY LAW.

Tell us what law is being enacted that you cannot either marry someone you love or that you can't think homosexuality is a sin? Go ahead Mr. Persecuted.
 
Oh yeah, you are SOOOOOO persecuted. :lamo Here, let me get a tissue so you can dry your tears of persecution :lamo

I don't need a tissue. Pointing out the irony of the homosexual marriage advocates calling everyone who isn't supportive of their goal to force all 50 states to create the oxymoron of homosexual marriage isn't crying. It's just calling attention to their rank hypocrisy
 
I keep hearing the homosexuals tossing around the word "bigotry" like it's some kind of magic word that makes people who disagree with them shut up. And it doesn't seem to be working for them. A little look at what the word actually means tells you why.



Aha! That's why it doesn't work for them. They're the ones that are intolerant of any opinion other than their own. The advocates of homosexual marriage are, by definition, the bigots because of their utter lack of tolerance for any opinion but their own on this matter.

hmm



big·ot
noun \ˈbi-gət\

: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)














EasyBib






Full Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance
 
I keep hearing the homosexuals tossing around the word "bigotry" like it's some kind of magic word that makes people who disagree with them shut up. And it doesn't seem to be working for them. A little look at what the word actually means tells you why.



Aha! That's why it doesn't work for them. They're the ones that are intolerant of any opinion other than their own. The advocates of homosexual marriage are, by definition, the bigots because of their utter lack of tolerance for any opinion but their own on this matter.

ok then you sure your not hearing a lot of hetero sexual to but in any case


lets see how you like it

papa your evil and dishonorable and your trying to bring down gods wrath on all of us

now accept that on faith or else your being intolerant shame on you

you have a point when it comes to gay marriage though we are bigoted against peapole who want to discriminate against gay couples and interfere with their lives just because they feel like it

guess were not being unfair hear either
 
Last edited:
I don't need a tissue. Pointing out the irony of the homosexual marriage advocates calling everyone who isn't supportive of their goal to force all 50 states to create the oxymoron of homosexual marriage isn't crying. It's just calling attention to their rank hypocrisy

Nope, not hypocrisy. The fact is homosexuals are not trying to make it illegal for you to marry, nor use the law to make it so you cannot think homosexuality is a sin.

So here's a tissue and if you need I can call a waaaaambualance for you and your concerns. SSM is happening DEAL WITH IT!
 
Oh yeah, you are SOOOOOO persecuted. :lamo Here, let me get a tissue so you can dry your tears of persecution

Here's the facts.

YOU want to deny the right for homosexuals to marry, BY LAW.

Tell us what law is being enacted that you cannot either marry someone you love or that you can't think homosexuality is a sin? Go ahead Mr. Persecuted.

hey now just became were treating him as an equal and not taking away his rights or personal freedom doesn't mean we tolerate his ****

o wait this is also fair
 
Last edited:
I don't need a tissue. Pointing out the irony of the homosexual marriage advocates calling everyone who isn't supportive of their goal to force all 50 states to create the oxymoron of homosexual marriage isn't crying. It's just calling attention to their rank hypocrisy

he got us again not tolerating some one saying something is an oxymoron just because they don't like it is being a bigot well except for the unfair part of the defection
 
he got us again not tolerating some one saying something is an oxymoron just because they don't like it is being a bigot well except for the unfair part of the defection

There you go again. No tolerance for people with opposing opinions. Me and COUNTLESS other people view "same sex marriage" as an oxymoron because it is. I wouldn't call you a bigot because you can't comprehend that because I'm not intolerant of opposing opinions like you are.
 
Damn right! If we can stop gay people from getting married then maybe that will significantly discourage gay people from having gay sex and less gay sex in turn will reduce the number of gay babies that are born. Brilliant! :blink:

Well, this is Navy Pride you're dealing with.
 
LOL......pretty soon it will only be a handful few Southern States who still seek to impose governmental bigotry....but even those are soon to fall.

Gosh, southern states out of step with the rest of the country! Who would have thought?
 
hmm



big·ot
noun \ˈbi-gət\

: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)














EasyBib






Full Definition of BIGOT


: a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Thank you. That definition in it's entirety fits the way those of you advocating homosexual marriage act and react toward everyone that opposes your agenda. The shoe fits. Wear it with pride.
 
Thank you. That definition in it's entirety fits the way those of you advocating homosexual marriage act and react toward everyone that opposes your agenda. The shoe fits. Wear it with pride.

except for this bit - unfairly


trying to stop peapole from getting married based on gender doesn't help any one it just ****s with peapole lives

its fair not to accept that
 
except for this bit - unfairly


trying to stop peapole from getting married based on gender doesn't help any one it just ****s with peapole lives

its fair not to accept that

This isn't about "stopping people from getting married based on gender". In fact, marriage as we've all known over 100% of the globe prior to the year 2001 REQUIRED one of each sex, so it's ridiculous to argue that this is about gender discrimination.
 
There you go again. No tolerance for people with opposing opinions. Me and COUNTLESS other people view "same sex marriage" as an oxymoron because it is. I wouldn't call you a bigot because you can't comprehend that because I'm not intolerant of opposing opinions like you are.

its not a gay couple can do everything you need to do to be married

telling you man if you want an oxymoron for marriage go with single marriage the union of 1 person to them self that's actually an oxymoron

if your going to stick with something obviously not true base don prejudice that seems unfair and bigoted
 
its not a gay couple can do everything you need to do to be married

telling you man if you want an oxymoron for marriage go with single marriage the union of 1 person to them self that's actually an oxymoron

if your going to stick with something obviously not true base don prejudice that seems unfair and bigoted

Thanks for sharing whatever it is that you just shared with us there.
 
Thanks for sharing whatever it is that you just shared with us there.

it was a typical post from him that simply destroyed and proved your posts wrong.
 
This isn't about "stopping people from getting married based on gender". In fact, marriage as we've all known over 100% of the globe prior to the year 2001 REQUIRED one of each sex, so it's ridiculous to argue that this is about gender discrimination.

so its not about gender because traditionally you needed 2 genders so your not discriminating against a 1 gender couple based on gender

that doesn't makes sense

contradicting yourself in fact
 
This isn't about "stopping people from getting married based on gender". In fact, marriage as we've all known over 100% of the globe prior to the year 2001 REQUIRED one of each sex, so it's ridiculous to argue that this is about gender discrimination.


Well that is true.

Of course prior to Loving, there were claims that there wasn't racial discrimination because hey blacks could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other blacks. White could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other whites. It was just ridiculous to argue that was about racial discrimination.


***********************************


BTW - Technicially speaking, if it's not gender - what characteristic below is the controlling factor?

Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Heterosexual Woman = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal
Homosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal


>>>>
 
it was a typical post from him that simply destroyed and proved your posts wrong.

even gave him a free oxymoron because he did not have 1 related to marriage no gratitude with some peapole
 
now lets see



mar-riage




[mar-ij] Spell Syllables

Examples
Word Origin


noun
1.
(broadly) any of the diverse forms of interpersonal union established in various parts of the world to form a familial bond that is recognized legally, religiously, or socially, granting the participating partners mutual conjugal rights and responsibilities and including, for example, opposite-sex marriage, same-sex marriage, plural marriage, and arranged marriage:


ok now




ox-y-mo-ron




[ok-si-mawr-on, -mohr-] Spell Syllables

Examples
Word Origin


noun, plural oxymora

[ok-si-mawr-uh, -mohr-uh] (Show IPA), oxymorons. Rhetoric
1.
a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect, as in “cruel kindness” or “to make haste slowly.”.


ok then


well it seems same sex marriage is not a contradiction to the diverse forms of interpersonal union established in various parts of the world to form a familial bond that is recognized legally, religiously, or socially, granting the participating partners mutual conjugal rights and responsibilities
 
Well that is true.

Of course prior to Loving, there were claims that there wasn't racial discrimination because hey blacks could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other blacks. White could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other whites. It was just ridiculous to argue that was about racial discrimination.


***********************************


BTW - Technicially speaking, if it's not gender - what characteristic below is the controlling factor?

Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Heterosexual Woman = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal
Homosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal


>>>>

ok sure in that case it was discrimination

but obviously if they had just required every one to marry some 1 of another race then it could not have been racial discrimination to make it illegal to have a 1 race marriage :mrgreen:
 
Well that is true.

Of course prior to Loving, there were claims that there wasn't racial discrimination because hey blacks could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other blacks. White could marry, they were just REQUIRED to marry other whites. It was just ridiculous to argue that was about racial discrimination.


***********************************


BTW - Technicially speaking, if it's not gender - what characteristic below is the controlling factor?

Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Heterosexual Woman = Legal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Woman = Legal
Heterosexual Man + Heterosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Homosexual Man + Homosexual Man = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Heterosexual Woman = Illegal
Heterosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal
Homosexual Woman + Homosexual Woman = Illegal


>>>>

The controlling factor is that marriage is a union between two consenting people of opposite sexes, requiring one of each.
 
I keep hearing the homosexuals tossing around the word "bigotry" like it's some kind of magic word that makes people who disagree with them shut up. And it doesn't seem to be working for them. A little look at what the word actually means tells you why.



Aha! That's why it doesn't work for them. They're the ones that are intolerant of any opinion other than their own. The advocates of homosexual marriage are, by definition, the bigots because of their utter lack of tolerance for any opinion but their own on this matter.

I lol'd.

YOU are the one who advocates exclusionary policies.
 
Thank you. That definition in it's entirety fits the way those of you advocating homosexual marriage act and react toward everyone that opposes your agenda. The shoe fits. Wear it with pride.
Reading in context and understanding is the key here and you are not even close to the pier, thus missing the boat. Let me help you with that.

While it is true that people who do not like other or some ideas they can be called bigots also, the term is hardly if ever used for that purpose. The real meaning is the first part of the definition which clearly you are attempting to deflect from. The real meaning, the first one in every definition is about persons who are unfairly intolerant of others. Are you ashamed of being intolerant and wishing to deny others what you can enjoy?
 
Back
Top Bottom