• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

South Carolina Supreme Court Halts Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

Not if one considers SSM a sinful 'commitment'
That's what you fail to grasp.

don't marry some one of the same gender then

cant fix your hurt feelings but we can have you keep all the benefits your marge currently has

I suppose on the other hand marriage becomes better when arbitrary inequality is removed from it

so good news the feeling war cancels itself out
 
Even if you do, how does it affect YOU or YOUR commitment in any way?

Premarital sex is "sinful." Does its existence make your sex life (ew) less fulfilling?

don't you know the more gay people get married the less he is committed to his marriage ( just kidding of course )
 
you going to need to explain that

Your lack of religious background makes that really difficult but, I'll try.

Satan uses his minions of demons to cause all sorts of mayhem and chaos. Disease, afflictions/disorders (including homosexuality), possessions, even bad habits are all caused by these demons inhabiting (manifesting) our being.
 
Your lack of religious background makes that really difficult but, I'll try.

Satan uses his minions of demons to cause all sorts of mayhem and chaos. Disease, afflictions/disorders (including homosexuality), possessions, even bad habits are all caused by these demons inhabiting (manifesting) our being.

ok now can you go and prove that some how? the existence of the things you mentioned don't prove the cause you proposed is the case you see
 
yet you both use the same kind of faith based prejudice your a lot like religious racists deal with it

It's not faith based in regards to racism. That would be a preexisting condition brought into the church.
 
ok now can you go and prove that some how? the existence of the things you mentioned don't prove the cause you proposed is the case you see

What do you think causes all those things I described?
 
Your lack of religious background makes that really difficult but, I'll try.

Satan uses his minions of demons to cause all sorts of mayhem and chaos. Disease, afflictions/disorders (including homosexuality), possessions, even bad habits are all caused by these demons inhabiting (manifesting) our being.

Oooookay.

*backs away slowly*
 
It's not faith based in regards to racism. That would be a preexisting condition brought into the church.

yet you can be indoctrinated with religious racism and other prejudices though faith being Canaan or not doesn't seem to make much of a difference
 
Your lack of religious background makes that really difficult but, I'll try.

Satan uses his minions of demons to cause all sorts of mayhem and chaos. Disease, afflictions/disorders (including homosexuality), possessions, even bad habits are all caused by these demons inhabiting (manifesting) our being.

mayhem and chaos uncaring natural forces and people with their own will and opinions


diseases afflictions disorders microbes exposure to substances that alter the body internal genetic causes

apply some of that that to possessions to

basically I see what you mentioned as a part of nature
 
yet you can be indoctrinated with religious racism and other prejudices though faith being Canaan or not doesn't seem to make much of a difference

Canaan? was that a misspelling?
 
Allowing SSM for one. Changing other laws to include all sorts of perverse practices.

hmm you can marry a guy or a girl vs you must marry guys and some one else must marry girls

the 1st one seems less special
 
Canaan? was that a misspelling?

yes it was sorry

canon hope that's the right word not the big guns but




can-on1




[kan-uh n] Spell Syllables

Synonyms
Examples
Word Origin


noun
1.
an ecclesiastical rule or law enacted by a council or other competent authority and, in the Roman Catholic Church, approved by the pope.

2.
the body of ecclesiastical law.

3.
the body of rules, principles, or standards accepted as axiomatic and universally binding in a field of study or art:
"the neoclassical canon."

4.
a fundamental principle or general rule:
"the canons of good behavior."

5.
a standard; criterion:
"the canons of taste."

6.
the books of the Bible recognized by any Christian church as genuine and inspired.

7.
any officially recognized set of sacred books.
 
mayhem and chaos uncaring natural forces and people with their own will and opinions


diseases afflictions disorders microbes exposure to substances that alter the body internal genetic causes

apply some of that that to possessions to

basically I see what you mentioned as a part of nature
I was providing [what I consider to be] a Biblical perspective/explanation.
 
I was providing [what I consider to be] a Biblical perspective/explanation.

ok now how do we fined out if that's the truth because if its not we should act accordingly

if we cant even tell we should also act accordingly
 
Yeah, try any of that and you will be shouted down by the mob.

1.)The plain and simple truth of the matter is that you are NOT the majority, not in South Carolina, which is what this thread is about.
2.) The people's legislature enacted the law that says marriage is between a man and a woman, and it was signed by the governor.
3.) The state is well within it's rights according to the Constitution, and it is you who are in the minority, even if you do live in South Carolina, which I doubt.
4.) The power to interfere in the state's business has not been given to the federal government, Constitutionally speaking.
5.) But that's what left wingers do on this issue...mind other people's business.
6.)There are a few FACTS for you.

1.) its the majority of the country but whats awesome is thats just a bonus, majority doesnt matter on individual rights
2.) correct illegally and in violation of the constitution
3.) repeating this lie wont make it true. Facts. law, rights the constitution and many court cases and judges all prove it wrong.
4.) good thing they didnt interfere then, making up strawmen like this wont work. Nobody honest and educated buys it. The FED did exactly what its is supposed to do. The state over stepped, violated the constitution and individual rights and the FED fixed. SOrry equal rights bothers you but equal rights dont care.
5.) LMAO as soon as ANYBODY says left wingers or right wingers as one group, we all know the argument is an instant fail. The biased is obvious. News flash righties and lefties both support equal rights and the only people in other peoples buisness are those trying to deny equal rights.
6.) where? you didnt present ONE single fact that supports your claims and matters to equal rights . . not one, if you disagree simple please state them now and factually prove them, thanks.
 
1.)That is not how we do things in America. If the Feds have the votes, let them pass a law and let the president sign it. The opinion of an unelected judge as law is not democracy, it is oligharchy, and THAT is what is not Constitutional.
2.)I say put it to a nationwide vote and we will see just who is in the majority.

1.) actually its EXACTLY how it is supposed to work lol are you foreign?
2.) thank you for now proving how severely uneducated you are about this topic, there cant be a national vote on equal rights, THAT is against the constitution and exactly why the states got corrected.
 
I am a Roman Catholic and I have been taught love the sinner and hate the sin and since gays live in sin and can't marry in the eyes of the church they have a problem unless they remain celibate.

How do you feel about people who commit adultery and who frequent prostitutes?

What is the official Roman Catholic position on those issues?

And do you have to be truly sorry in order to fully repent? Or is it ok to claim to be repentant but still brag about one's indiscretions?
 
yes it was sorry

canon hope that's the right word not the big guns but




can-on1




[kan-uh n] Spell Syllables

Synonyms
Examples
Word Origin


noun
1.
an ecclesiastical rule or law enacted by a council or other competent authority and, in the Roman Catholic Church, approved by the pope.

2.
the body of ecclesiastical law.

3.
the body of rules, principles, or standards accepted as axiomatic and universally binding in a field of study or art:
"the neoclassical canon."

4.
a fundamental principle or general rule:
"the canons of good behavior."

5.
a standard; criterion:
"the canons of taste."

6.
the books of the Bible recognized by any Christian church as genuine and inspired.

7.
any officially recognized set of sacred books.

What you see as discrimination or prejudice is merely rejecting sin. Call it indoctrination if you will.

Canaan is approximately the same region as Levant.

Levant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
1.)The minority does not have veto power over the will of the people, that is not Constitutional.
2.)Make a law and pass it, if you think you are so much in the right.

1.) good thing this didnt happen, its another failed strawman, nothing was "veto" by the minority or majority LOL
2.) its already a right, and in law, nothing more is needed.

Once again proof that you do not understand how rights and laws work.
 
How about if I pass a law that says an unelected judge cannot enact "law"?

That would be constitutional.

no judge enacted a law what happened is the law and rights were protected . . . again, your strawman fails
 
ok now how do we fined out if that's the truth because if its not we should act accordingly

if we cant even tell we should also act accordingly

Faith! Find faith.
 
1.)I know, everything that doesn't go your way is "unconstitutional". How can you argue with "logic" like that?
2.)The solution is simple: pass a law. I am sure that any law that does not go your way will be "unconstitutional", though.
1.) something like 30+ judges also ruled that
2.) not needed and again thats not constitutional in premis, its hilarious your argument is about constitutionality and your counter solution is to do something that goes against the constitution.
 
I'll do that when you show me in the Constitution where the opinion of one man (who doesn't even live in that state) becomes law for an entire state.

PLEASE PLEASE tell us what LAW you are talking about lol

WHat LAW was just created?
 
Back
Top Bottom