• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

South Carolina Supreme Court Halts Same-Sex Marriage Licenses

When you face your maker you will regret that statement.

I have faith and confidence that I won't. If so, then that is not a deity I want to worship and still feel quite comfortable with my beliefs.
 
How about their being a horrible example.for our young people? How about we would eventually die out if everyone decide to be Gay? How about God detroying us for allowing it to be normalised?

Decide to be gay?

Are you for real?
 
Most divorces aren't because of abuse.

No, but probably many are due to adultery. That is an abuse of the other partner in that commitment/contract.

Nice attempt at avoiding an answer tho.
 
And why is legal separation insufficient?

When it comes to intent, how is it any different?

Are you saying the law means something in God's eyes in some cases, but not in others?

Because millions of non-believers get married and enter into that state contract.

And did you ever answer why people that desire to honor commitments like you believe...dont just do so...without any 'state' sanctions at all? The state, marriage contracts, are not religious and have nothing to do with your 'very personal beliefs.'

I can go find that post if you like..the one you ignored.
 
unless you continue to sin ....then hes not that loving.

:lamo

Do tell us about Jesus' rants against homosexuality.
 
This thread is hiliarious. In any other thread the right wingers in this thread preaching to the rest of us and are sooooo concerned about he sexual behavior of other people... these people would be telling us how important individual responsibility is. Let other people be responsible for themselves then.

Why is someone else having sex so important to these people? Relax and get laid folks. Mind your own business.
 
It is his way of making it seem like he is not advocating for a theocratic like rule.

Yes I know. He has admitted it in the past.

Altho that is why he desires and he admits that too. Altho he denies that 'Catholic constructionism' or whatever it's called is not a theocracy. (Which is BS)
 
Lursa said:
Well fornication within marriage is adultery, so then why did you say 'non-fornicating?'

A normal hetero marriage

How is that an answer to the post you just responded to? You named a noun. Not a reason. Please try again.
 
unless you continue to sin ....then hes not that loving.

He is indeed that loving and forgiving and takes the entire breadth of our lives into consideration, not one thing. A gay family, raising their kids in a healthy, happy environment? God would NEVER judge them harshly. If you believe that, you are living in the Old Testament in order to gratify yourself and your own judgements...which is against God's Law.
 
How about their being a horrible example.for our young people? How about we would eventually die out if everyone decide to be Gay? How about God detroying us for allowing it to be normalised?

LMAO

It's not an 'example' because you cannot 'turn' people gay. We will not eventually die out because 'no one decides' to be gay. And no rational people are worried about God destroying us because of gay people. He is watching to see how we treat our fellow Brothers and will judge us on that. And if we hate and deny them....those are the people that will be judged, not gays that are born the way they are.

So you just posted something 100% wrong :lamo
 
He is indeed that loving and forgiving and takes the entire breadth of our lives into consideration, not one thing. A gay family, raising their kids in a healthy, happy environment? God would NEVER judge them harshly. If you believe that, you are living in the Old Testament in order to gratify yourself and your own judgements...which is against God's Law.

These folks have a habit of conflating old and new testaments... usually due to ignorance of both. They'll tell us Jesus is the son of God and IS God... then beat us over the head with the old testament scripture which pre-existed Jesus then run away mad when you ask them to clarify what God they follow.
 
Because it is not possible ontologically to terminate such a marriage.

OMG, how irrelevant!

Ontological argument:

: an argument for the existence of God based upon the meaning of the term God


Palecon continues to attempt to get Americal to create (or maintain) law based on a belief in God. :)
 
LMAO

It's not an 'example' because you cannot 'turn' people gay. We will not eventually die out because 'no one decides' to be gay. And no rational people are worried about God destroying us because of gay people. He is watching to see how we treat our fellow Brothers and will judge us on that. And if we hate and deny them....those are the people that will be judged, not gays that are born the way they are.

So you just posted something 100% wrong :lamo

I am curious where the gay indoctrination center is for all the people switching sexual preference will be.:lamo
 
When you face your maker you will regret that statement.

unless their is no maker or said maker thinks pop eye hear is full of it to
 
Heteros are by nature non-fornicating but, I do indeed dislike adulterers.

um that's not true

consensual sexual intercourse between two persons not married to each other

you can do that and be hetero sexual

I know I do
 
Simply by their unnatural existence. They are like a blight on the citrus crop....a stye on your eye....the nasty last sip of a cheap beer.

but they exist naturally their not artificial

and they don't kill all your fruit or make you gay

and even though you cant seem to see celery when you look at them they are not the cause of that

you should probably not try and drink from them though well unless you get permission
 
We are discussing marriage and the married

and the nature of hetero and homosexuals which you did not seem to know much about in either case
 
How about their being a horrible example.for our young people? How about we would eventually die out if everyone decide to be Gay? How about God detroying us for allowing it to be normalised?

how is being gay itself a hobble example to young people or nay kind of example beyond being an example for homosexuality in which case its a great example ?

since you don't choose to be gay and you could still choose to have a child with some one of the opposite gender how is homosexuality going to cause a die off?

since we have no evidence of a god or evidence that god is a murderous jack ass how is it any more likely that were going to get smitten for treating gay people decently then if we let people like you abuse others?
 
unless you continue to sin ....then hes not that loving.

And since we are all sinners...you have just micromanaged God into being a garden variety hater.
 
No, but probably many are due to adultery. That is an abuse of the other partner in that commitment/contract.

Nice attempt at avoiding an answer tho.

There wasn't a question.

When it comes to intent, how is it any different?

Are you saying the law means something in God's eyes in some cases, but not in others?

Because millions of non-believers get married and enter into that state contract.

And did you ever answer why people that desire to honor commitments like you believe...dont just do so...without any 'state' sanctions at all? The state, marriage contracts, are not religious and have nothing to do with your 'very personal beliefs.'

I can go find that post if you like..the one you ignored.

Because divorce purports to legitimize the prospect if remarriage.

OMG, how irrelevant!

Ontological argument:

: an argument for the existence of God based upon the meaning of the term God


Palecon continues to attempt to get Americal to create (or maintain) law based on a belief in God. :)

Now what are you babbling about?
 
OMG, how irrelevant!

Ontological argument:

: an argument for the existence of God based upon the meaning of the term God


Palecon continues to attempt to get Americal to create (or maintain) law based on a belief in God. :)

There it is in a nutshell.
 
Lursa said:
People can change their minds, and they can also legally get out of contracts. Life changes, people change. No one else is justified in judging their reasons. Certainly not you or the govt.

Forcing people to remain in relationships can do more harm than good...more abuse, more violence, more children seeing and continuing the cycle.

You extend your religious beliefs into fantasy. That is scary.

And 'my God' is the God of the New Testament. Loving and forgiving. Not vengeful and petty.

Most divorces aren't because of abuse.

Lursa said:
No, but probably many are due to adultery. That is an abuse of the other partner in that commitment/contract.

Nice attempt at avoiding an answer tho.

There wasn't a question.

No, it wasnt a question...it refuted your attempt at an answer.

As you still cannot refute it, my argument remains as truth.
 
When you face your maker you will regret that statement.

Why do you fundies get some kind of erotic thrill out of telling people that they will suffer after death?

You have no business speaking for your sadomasochistic "god"
 
It is correct that my being Catholic is why I believe divorce should be illegal.

Is the USA a Catholic run theocratic government?

No

Then, too freaking bad for you, your beliefs don't make law.
 
Because divorce purports to legitimize the prospect if remarriage.

And our law allows people to divorce and move on with their lives. No one's asking you or anyone besides the govt to 'legitimize it.' Your perspective on it means nothing outside your own beliefs, or perhaps anyone that shares them.
 
Back
Top Bottom