- Joined
- Jul 21, 2005
- Messages
- 51,675
- Reaction score
- 35,460
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers
Which I've stated multiple times may very well be the case in most instances
But that's irrelevant to the point of who PROVIDES those things.
All pointing that out does is act as a diversion. If someone says "The employer is the one providing the benefits" and someone goes "No they don't, that's the union" that's just simply wrong. The union doesn't PROVIDE it. They may be the impetus for WHY the employer provided it...but it's still the employer providing it.
Except, of course, that the reason the employer does all of these things is because of the union.
Which I've stated multiple times may very well be the case in most instances
But that's irrelevant to the point of who PROVIDES those things.
All pointing that out does is act as a diversion. If someone says "The employer is the one providing the benefits" and someone goes "No they don't, that's the union" that's just simply wrong. The union doesn't PROVIDE it. They may be the impetus for WHY the employer provided it...but it's still the employer providing it.