In any case, I was clearly comparing a specific amendment to the Constitution with unions and the horse-and-buggy in order to mock the poster's argument (partly as a reductio ad absurdum and partly as another one of those 'petard hoistings' that some posters don't seem to understand).
Returning to the reading issue, would a larger font help? . . . . . Crayons, maybe?
Scabs should be harassed and intimidated. It is an affront to every working man out there that you've got people who'll bottom feed and piss on all the work and effort that has gone in to organized labor.
As I said in an earlier post, The Right to Work For Less crowd's take on this is completely hypocritical. They'd gladly let union busting, employer intimidation, and use of the police to further the ends of the employer but then when not even a fraction of their tactics are used by the other side, they get all indignant, all, --"Why I NEVER?!?!? This must be stopped, those poor people!!"
I mean get bent, seriously...
Yet you have no argument--just a side-swiping drive-by critique of others' comments.
Stay focused on the OP--how do nonUnion scabs sleep at night knowing they're cheating their fellow brothers and sisters--without alcohol that is?
I wouldn't feel too safe in the workplace if I was them--even with all those nasty regulations .
Chemists Have Solutions .
The rest of your post has been either refuted or addressed. Try to keep up
And scabs are the workers who work across picket lines, not generally all non-union workers.
Now, what other possible reason would the union have of publishing these names other than to target them for harassment?
if other folks want to unionize and pay 2/3rds of their dues to items other than representation ,that's fine with me too.... folks are free to pay for any old thing they want to pay for.