Page 51 of 124 FirstFirst ... 41495051525361101 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 1237

Thread: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers[W:702:1041]

  1. #501
    Educator Meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    02-22-15 @ 10:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    677

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    And you are no true conservative sir--
    do you support scabs not paying their fair share of negotiating costs--

    not the faux poutrage of dues that deservedly go to DEM candidates to fight the "corporations are people"
    scum who have fought against Unions since TR gave them to us !
    To me, unions are a dinosaur.....that should 'splain things to you, son.
    Probably why your numbers are diminishing, another generation or two
    unions will be totally irrelevent.

  2. #502
    Sage
    Karl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    12-18-14 @ 09:35 AM
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    5,561

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by RedAkston View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Karl View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Meister View Post
    [...] IMO the unions and horse and buggy are very simular, they had their place in American history, but their time has come and gone.
    Just like the 2nd Amendment, eh?
    Did you seriously just compare an amendment to the Constitution to labor laws? [...]
    Another thing I see often, that really fascinates me, is the apparent inability to read. Is this something new or has it been creeping up on us for decades and I've simply failed to notice?

    In any case, I was clearly comparing a specific amendment to the Constitution with unions and the horse-and-buggy in order to mock the poster's argument (partly as a reductio ad absurdum and partly as another one of those 'petard hoistings' that some posters don't seem to understand).

    Returning to the reading issue, would a larger font help? . . . . . Crayons, maybe?

  3. #503
    Sage
    sangha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lower Hudson Valley, NY
    Last Seen
    09-17-17 @ 05:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    59,990

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrilla View Post
    you guys act like most of the union dues goes towards negotiating contracts and other representational services..... well, they don't..... less than 30% of member dues goes to representation,.
    And much of the rest goes to training, and safety for its' members, greivances and arbitration, research, legal services, overhead, communications, etc
    Quote Originally Posted by matchlight View Post
    Justice Thomas' opinions consistently contain precise, detailed constitutional analyses.
    Quote Originally Posted by jaeger19 View Post
    the vast majority of folks that need healthcare are on Medicare.. both rich and poor..

  4. #504
    Relentless Thinking Fury
    ChezC3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    9,125

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Scabs should be harassed and intimidated. It is an affront to every working man out there that you've got people who'll bottom feed and piss on all the work and effort that has gone in to organized labor.

    As I said in an earlier post, The Right to Work For Less crowd's take on this is completely hypocritical. They'd gladly let union busting, employer intimidation, and use of the police to further the ends of the employer but then when not even a fraction of their tactics are used by the other side, they get all indignant, all, --"Why I NEVER?!?!? This must be stopped, those poor people!!"

    I mean get bent, seriously...
    "Oh no no no, you got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. ” -- Sheriff Chris Mannix

  5. #505
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:31 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,774

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Yet you have no argument--just a side-swiping drive-by critique of others' comments.
    Stay focused on the OP--how do nonUnion scabs sleep at night knowing they're cheating their fellow brothers and sisters--without alcohol that is?
    I wouldn't feel too safe in the workplace if I was them--even with all those nasty regulations .

    Quote Originally Posted by Meister View Post
    This is your best serious argument? REALLY?
    Physics is Phun

  6. #506
    Sage
    rabbitcaebannog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Last Seen
    12-09-17 @ 08:35 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    10,918

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrilla View Post
    you guys act like most of the union dues goes towards negotiating contracts and other representational services..... well, they don't..... less than 30% of member dues goes to representation,.
    No, the point is the costs is divided amount it's members and members will have to pay more if their counterparts refuse to pay but those counterparts receive the same exact benefits.

  7. #507
    Educator Meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Seen
    02-22-15 @ 10:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    677

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    Libbos and Connies--Libbos and Connies--
    looks like yer diving back--hacking into yer Stormfront FOXhole of insults when YOU Can'tor argue the facts .
    The facts are from the libs own posts. Try and catch up and don't get so emotional, son.

  8. #508
    Sage
    Karl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last Seen
    12-18-14 @ 09:35 AM
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    5,561

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by Thrilla View Post
    automobiles replaced horse and buggies

    what has replaced firearms again?
    I would assume, based on the other poster's assertions, the same thing that replace the unions: the government

    I can understand the argument: since the government protects us so well in the workplace, then surely they can protect us everywhere else.

  9. #509
    Sage
    sangha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lower Hudson Valley, NY
    Last Seen
    09-17-17 @ 05:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    59,990

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    You can harass with public info alone.
    No one at this local was harrassed. I can use the info in a phone book to harass

    The rest of your post has been either refuted or addressed. Try to keep up

    And scabs are the workers who work across picket lines, not generally all non-union workers.

    Now, what other possible reason would the union have of publishing these names other than to target them for harassment?
    Quote Originally Posted by matchlight View Post
    Justice Thomas' opinions consistently contain precise, detailed constitutional analyses.
    Quote Originally Posted by jaeger19 View Post
    the vast majority of folks that need healthcare are on Medicare.. both rich and poor..

  10. #510
    Sage

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Texas, Vegas, Colombia
    Last Seen
    11-28-16 @ 06:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    20,295

    Re: ‘Pressure tactics’: Unions publishing names of nonunion workers

    Quote Originally Posted by rabbitcaebannog View Post
    And the union side if the story is it's inappropriate for them to have to equally protect people who refuse to pay for representation. Instead, their coworkers who pay union dues are paying for it.
    FWIW, I think the non-union workers should reimburse the union for any monies that were spent in his/her representation ... however, i do not believe any employer should be forced or coerced to be a full time dues-paying member and pay for items unrelated to representation

    if other folks want to unionize and pay 2/3rds of their dues to items other than representation ,that's fine with me too.... folks are free to pay for any old thing they want to pay for.

Page 51 of 124 FirstFirst ... 41495051525361101 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •