Page 86 of 88 FirstFirst ... 36768485868788 LastLast
Results 851 to 860 of 880

Thread: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

  1. #851
    Sage
    roguenuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    29,023

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    What protection are they not getting that I am?
    You can get married to a woman, I nor any other woman can do that, and only due to our genders. I can marry a woman but you nor any other man can do that (in those states with same sex marriage bans). That is treating people differently with the law, which has been recognized as violating the EPC of the 14th Amendment. The law is not recognizing our rights to marry the person of our choice regardless of our relative genders. The state nor the people have any legitimate state interest furthered in doing this.
    "A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt

    Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.

  2. #852
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,571

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    So you think overturning interracial marriage bans was outside the power of SCOTUS.
    I think I already answered that silly question in this thread. I didn't know that same sex meant interracial.
    "We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
    "I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker

  3. #853
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,571

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by roguenuke View Post
    You can get married to a woman, I nor any other woman can do that, and only due to our genders. I can marry a woman but you nor any other man can do that (in those states with same sex marriage bans). That is treating people differently with the law, which has been recognized as violating the EPC of the 14th Amendment. The law is not recognizing our rights to marry the person of our choice regardless of our relative genders. The state nor the people have any legitimate state interest furthered in doing this.
    So, anyone can that wants to can get married. And if you don't want to, you don't have to. But I digress. Not a federal issue, that's all I am saying.
    "We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
    "I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker

  4. #854
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    What protection are they not getting that I am?
    Spousal privilege in criminal cases.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    So, anyone can that wants to can get married. And if you don't want to, you don't have to. But I digress. Not a federal issue, that's all I am saying.
    Not a Federal issue, no, nobody says it is. Constitutional issue.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  5. #855
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    I think I already answered that silly question in this thread. I didn't know that same sex meant interracial.
    The 14th amendment doesn't mention race, marriage, and certainly not interracial marriage. Why do you think it applies to racial issues? Why do you think it applies to interracial marriage?
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  6. #856
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,827

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    1.)As far as I can remember in this country, marriage has been between a man and a woman only. I don't know of any time in our history that it's been anything else. That's why it's a redefinition.
    2.) But the issue that bothers me, whichever way it goes, is that the Federal government has no authority to get involved.
    3.) Those judges should be turning the cases away because it is up to the States. The Constitution does not give the power to them, so it automatically resides with the States and the people.
    1.) sorry still not a redefinition, just a protection of rights.
    2.) actually they are doing EXACTLY what they are supposed to, keep eachother in heck. In this case the state over reached and violated individual rights and the FED fixe it.
    3.) 100% False, see facts, law, rights and court cases. States have no rights here to violated the constitution or individual freedom.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #857
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:43 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,827

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    I think I already answered that silly question in this thread. I didn't know that same sex meant interracial.
    THis is a dodge, you know this question is more prove that your opinion is actually false and this is also why court rulings on this issue even refer to loving v virginia.
    Thats "silly" questions totally proves your failed argument wrong.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  8. #858
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,972

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    Well, it was spelled out quite simply. Not that hard to understand, unless of course, you don't want to.
    So then you do support big govt and expanding it so that it can provide a broader definition of marriage which is already covered by anti-discrimination laws (as fed courts are finding for?)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  9. #859
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,972

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    No, you mashed it up to say something I didn't say, so your misunderstanding would fit better. Don't play that game with me. If you can't figure out how some amendments increase government power, and other's restrict it, it's not my problem to educate you. Most libs don't look beyond what's in front of their faces anyway, so they don't care what the effect is down the road, as long as they get what they want right now.
    Ooooo, scary generalizations that mean nothing!

    And yet, no substance to back up your support for (& belief in necessity) a new amendment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

  10. #860
    Sage
    Lursa's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Outside Seattle
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:21 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,972

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Anthony60 View Post
    As far as I can remember in this country, marriage has been between a man and a woman only. I don't know of any time in our history that it's been anything else. That's why it's a redefinition. But the issue that bothers me, whichever way it goes, is that the Federal government has no authority to get involved. Those judges should be turning the cases away because it is up to the States. The Constitution does not give the power to them, so it automatically resides with the States and the people.
    Do you remember when polygamy was legal and included in the definition?

    How about...did you live in the states where the definition didnt include people of different races marrying and THAT had to be redefined?

    No amendments needed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    I have felt pain when I was in the womb. So when you say they are incapable of feeling pain, that is based on junk science.
    Quote Originally Posted by applejuicefool View Post
    A murderer putting a bullet through someone's brain is a medical procedure too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •