Page 59 of 88 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast
Results 581 to 590 of 880

Thread: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

  1. #581
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    How long do you think the people who are a majority against ssm will put up with activist judges?
    Sorry, but they aren't activist judges and the only ones on the right that are upset enough to even consider "sucession" over SSM are a VERY TINY MINORITY throwing temper tantrums like a baby. Here's a hint, the MAJORITY of the country doesn't really care if it gets legalized. I think some on the right need a WAAAAAAAmbulance.

  2. #582
    Educator
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Last Seen
    02-08-16 @ 03:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    816

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by WorldWatcher View Post
    What??????????

    The Justices let stand the rulings of the 10th, 7th, and 4th Federal Circuit Court of Appeals which OVERTURN State bans.

    That is not a "ruling" in favor of States being able to ban Civil Marriage based on gender.




    The cases were from the 10th, 7th, and 4th Circuit courts. None of the cases rejected Monday was from the 9th Circuit.

    None of the dozen or so Judges (District or Appeals) was queer.

    The judges represented a mixture of "liberal" and "conservative" judges appointed by both Democrat and Republican Presidents. Judges such as Posner, long considered to be a conservative judge in the 7th Circuit court and appointed by Ronald Reagan.




    >>>>
    You still have a majority of appointed judges not elected judges making law, that is not how the founders wanted it, they used an ballot referendum, got the signatures, and voted on it, and the 12 men overturned the will of the people, it should be considered criminal.

  3. #583
    Educator
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Last Seen
    02-08-16 @ 03:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    816

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Um, no, you are wrong. This dismissal means that every circuit court to date has overturned state bans. The states had their ban overturned, that's not leaving it to the states.
    It was judicial activism no matter how you slice it!

  4. #584
    Educator
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Last Seen
    02-08-16 @ 03:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    816

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    Sorry, but they aren't activist judges and the only ones on the right that are upset enough to even consider "sucession" over SSM are a VERY TINY MINORITY throwing temper tantrums like a baby. Here's a hint, the MAJORITY of the country doesn't really care if it gets legalized. I think some on the right need a WAAAAAAAmbulance.
    You are full of **** then why did so many states have to have their referendums overturned jackwagon, why did the judges even intercede it was judicial activism that overturned a matter that was voted on, one side won and liberal ass hats couldn't handle it.

  5. #585
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,033

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    just admit you have no answer!
    Just read the thread.

  6. #586
    Guru
    WorldWatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,041

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by WorldWatcher View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    Show me where it says marriage for same sex is a guaranteed right.
    Do you think that rights must be enumerated in the Constitution for them to be held by the people?



    >>>>
    so it is not in there got it!

    Why dodge the question?


    Do you think that rights must be enumerated in the Constitution for them to be held by the people?


    >>>>

  7. #587
    Educator
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    ohio
    Last Seen
    02-08-16 @ 03:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    816

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    Just read the thread.
    You are dismissed because you are intellectually dishonest.

  8. #588
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,033

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    You are dismissed because you are intellectually dishonest.
    Okey dokey Annie Oakley. As I said, I'm already getting what I want. You're the one who's going to have to come to terms with the new ways.

  9. #589
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    You are full of **** then why did so many states have to have their referendums overturned jackwagon, why did the judges even intercede it was judicial activism that overturned a matter that was voted on, one side won and liberal ass hats couldn't handle it.
    That wasn't what you said. You said the majority would want to secede over it. Sorry people don't care that much about SSM being legal to do that. And no they aren't activist judges. With each state that SSM becomes legal, I toast to the anti-SSM with a big "Suck it".

  10. #590
    Guru
    1750Texan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Southcental Texas
    Last Seen
    10-14-17 @ 02:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    3,569

    Re: **BREAKING** U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Rule on Gay Marriage

    Quote Originally Posted by SENSIBLE PATRIO View Post
    You still have a majority of appointed judges not elected judges making law, that is not how the founders wanted it, they used an ballot referendum, got the signatures, and voted on it, and the 12 men overturned the will of the people, it should be considered criminal.
    The States wrote the SSM bans. The Judges did not. The judges are ruling that the laws written by the states are unconstitutional. That is their job as described by the Constitution.

    What laws have the Judges written?

    No where in the Constitution does it say through vote or through referendum or through state Constitution can rights of the people be voted away...NO where.


Page 59 of 88 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •