"You're the only person that decides how far you'll go and what you're capable of." - Ben Saunders (Explorer and Endurance Athlete)
You're suggesting that the amendment process should be limited to "maintenance." Even if someone somewhere wrote that down in the secondary literature, there are no such limits, or even a suggestion thereof, in the Constitution itself.What? Again, see my first comment about comprehension.
In your claims that amendments were for "maintenance only."And I said there was where?
And yet, people from all political persuasions routinely utilize the court for exactly that purpose. Go figure.More babble from travelling down the path of non-comprehension. The Constitution can be modified, updated, changed - that's why we have an amendment process. Reinterpretation is a ****ty way to go and not at all consistent with the Constitutional government we created.
Oh?All this was discussed in the Federalist Papers. It puts all the power in the hands of a few lifetime appointed robes.
"....the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them.... The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."
Federalist 73 also discusses why it's a bad idea for Congress to decide the constitutionality of its own laws; it asserts that the judiciary should be able to void laws; and defends the idea of an independent judiciary with lifetime appointments.
"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free."
"When we live authentically we create an opportunity for others to walk out of their dark prisons of pretend into freedom."
Do we really need to put "**BREAKING**" in the title in a "*BRAKING NEWS*" forum?
If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
"But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.