- Joined
- Dec 22, 2005
- Messages
- 66,334
- Reaction score
- 47,312
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
let's call it retirement eligibleI'm getting it from your posts. You claimed there were more people born in 1946 than at any other time. That would make those people 68 today. Their brothers and sisters have barely hit 65, and many have not hit 60 yet.
Add in the census data that shows more 65+ year old people are continuing to work than before, and the suggestion that anyone 60 or over is retiring is not supported by the available data. Perhaps I'm wrong in my interpretation, but it seems your confusing retired, with retirement age.
for social security purposes, i became retirement eligible (62) in august. (for purposes of full disclosure, i have been retired from my employer for 11 plus years)
and many, like me, chose to defer immediate social security retirement upon eligibility because it will enhance our earnings later. we put pencil to paper and realized it is smarter financially - long term - to defer retirement
however, at the height of the notso great recession, a number of my friends and acquaintances, having lost their jobs, or working reduced hours, and having few prospects at finding replacement employment equivalent to that they were forced to relinquish, chose to begin receiving social security benefits as soon as they became eligible. they preferred to defer that choice to realize greater total benefits. but the economy did not cooperate. they accepted the lesser, but immediate, benefit only because they needed the income. then
as the economy has begun improving, that more retirement eligibles are deferring to a later date to commence receiving their benefits is not surprising. an anecdotal observation to be certain, but one which appears to square with the data