Re: Michael Dunn found guilty of 1st-degree murder in loud-music trial
If? No evidence to support that at all, none.
My Gawd. Not only do you not know the evidnce you don't even know how the Law works.
And again. That is not how it works.
He does not need evidence to support what is stated. It needs to be disproved. That is how it works. And there is no evidence that disproves his account. Do you really not understand that?
The testimony obviously did not support your theory. I am using his murder 1 conviction by a jury of 10 whites and 2 blacks as proof of that failed story he told.
Then you fail at arguing the evidence. And you fail because you are assuming, as you do not know why they found the way they did.
For all you know the Prosecutor got the Jury stacked with those who just don't like the use of guns.
Actually like the rest of your nonsense, it is irrelevant. Much like his life no parole plus sixty years conviction will not bring back his innocent victim.
You are the only one speaking nonsense. ANd Davis wasn't a victim but a a person who got himself killed over his own actions.
10 shots into the car, and he then gets in his car and drives away. Sorry that is again more nonsense.
Just more absurdity from you.
No it isn't nonsense.
What he stated makes very good sense.
Wrong.
"Thug" is not racist code for nigger.
If you think so, your thoughts are convoluted.
Which really just shows this was all about race for you and not the evidence.
Tripods have rubber feet and look nothing at all like a shotgun
Look at you being wrong and dishonest again.
A tripod leg with its "end cap" or "foot" removed can certainly looks like the barrel of a shot gun.
So what other bs do you want to spew?
It is not nonsense and every contextual use re-enforces the modern meaning.
You make that abundantly apparent.
Your nonsense is nonsense.
What you said is not credible.
"Thug" is not racist code for nigger.
Which really just shows this was all about race for you and not the evidence. Which you previously made abundantly clear.
Dude. Reality check. TWO juries convicted Dunn. The second found for FIRST DEGREE MURDER.
Give it up. Sometimes white guys use guns and say it is self defense. Sometimes white guys with guns lie.
Reality check. Your arguments are wrong for the reasons already stated.
So again, since you do not pay attention.
We are not talking about what the decision of the Jury, we all know what it was, just as we all know Juries make mistakes.
We are talking about the evidence. At there is no credible evidence that says his account is false.
And some members of the first Jury don't disagree with me
as to the charge against Davis, which is specifically what we are talking about. Which in all reality, made their finding on the other charges incorrect and overturnable.
He was a man that had shot his gun many times into a carload of people.
See. This is what you get for not paying attention.
He was a man who was firing at a threat.
Had it been found that he had acted in self defense, those previous findings of guilt could not have stood.
If he was in fear for his life he would have hightailed it to a police station or used his cell to call 911.Or at the least called 911 once he got to the hotel.
Bs! People act differently. There is no set way a person must act. Nor was there any requirement. Period. Especially after a traumatic experience that he had just gone through. And especially with having to deal with the emotional basket case of his GF.
So you truly have no point here, and really do not know of what you speak.
I really am almost believing you are a plant by the gun control side to make the anti-gun control activists look unreasonable. :shock:
Good for you?
It just shows that your thoughts are convoluted.
Two juries paid attention to the evidence - more completely than you and I.
You clearly do not know of what you speak.
What a shame.
Are you too going to be dishonest and say a leg of a tripod could not look like a barrel of a shot gun?
I hope you are not that dishonest.