Re: Michael Dunn found guilty of 1st-degree murder in loud-music trial
WTF? For the purposes of this topic I already did.
What about his actions of threatening to kill Dunn, along with an intimated ability to do so, coupled with his getting out to carry through with the threat, do you not understand?
What you have is a black teen playing loud music
Which has nothing to do with why Dunn shot at him.
with no physical evidence of a gun.
Lack of finding a gun (which they had ample opportunity to ditch when the drove away), doesn't mean there was no gun involved.
Especially as the cops didn't bother to look for several days after it was reported. Which is a very important point.Especially as the driver called his aunt who was in the area with his cousin.
In addition, as I keep pointing out, the tripod under the seat may have been what Davis used. Either to purposely intimate the threat of a gun, or to just emphasize the threat he made.
And if that is what he did, that makes Dunn's response just as reasonable had it been an actual gun.
The only "evidence" of a gun comes from the guy who shot the teen,
And?
The possibility that a gun existed still exists and as such, there is no evidence to doubt it.
Unless there is some underlying mental health issue, which there is none in this case, people just don't go around shooting others for the hell of it.
Responding to an actual threat is the norm. Not the exception.
Dunn was responding and there is no evidence to counter that.
fled the seen and did not wish to report the incident in a timely manner.
Funny that you trust the killer with that fled the scene.
Funny how you think saying he is a killer matters one bit. :lamo
Especially as no credible evidence shows he wasn't acting in self defense.
Funny that you do not understand that all folks do not act the same way.
Fleeing from dangerous people is normal.
As for not in a timely manner? BS. You do not determine what is or isn't a timely manner. Nor do you get to hold him responsible for something he is not required to do.
He stated his concerns as to why he left and what he was thinking in regards to contacting the authorities and they are all valid.
All you are doing is making **** up to not accept his account, and that just doesn't fly. Nor is it evidence that his account isn't true.
All this is, is you making up reason not to believe his account.