Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
If she was my employee, with that record of near misses...she'd be fired.
There were obvious gaps.
You do realize that there were more intrusions that just those 2, right?
Questioning the competence of a security team w/a 30 yr. record of keeping their main man safe because of what appears to laymen as indifference based on 2 isolated incidents picked out by the media (among the 100s of others) is absurd, to say the least.
But then again, it's not--as everyone knows, whenever some pathetic GOP pol exploits an event like this--one of many the media just chooses to expose--to score some cheap political points against his opponents, there's always an equally pathetic right winger around to jump and down like a trained monkey to regurgitate that pol's politically motivated rants, i. e.
"Dey let an armed man near the President. HELL NO, fire the whole SS! Arm those guys w/RPGs and tanks! We gotta get out the marines!!"
It's almost as stupid and pathetic as the cafe liberals who jump up and down wanting to ban all guns because of one or two incidents where some maniac guns down a school, neglecting the millions of other cases not reported by the major networks where guns were successfully used for self-defense.
Only a fool judges a book by two of its pages.
We finally found a security matter that Obama will respond to swiftly: Himself.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he stops voting for the Free Fish party.