• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI looking into Moore beheading after suspect tried to convert others to Islam

He is a byproduct of the rising jailhouse coverts who has advanced into domestic terrorism.
 
vesper said:
What if there is evidence this character is linked to Al Qaeda Leader Awlaki, the Boston Bomber's Mosque? That he was fired over an argument about stoning women.......... that on a facebook page he spewed radical Islam all over it praising those who have harmed us and continue to threaten to harm our citizens?

Oklahoma Beheader Linked to Al Qaeda Leader Awlaki, Boston Bomber's Mosque
Click to expand...

When a catholic priest molests children, we don't describe people who attended his church as "linked to child molestation."
 
j-mac said:
Oklahoma Beheader Alton Nolen Celebrated Terrorists On Facebook | The Daily Caller

https://www.facebook.com/alton.threadgill

Yeah, nah...he was just your average non violent guy....
Click to expand...

Literally nobody has called this guy "non violent," for fairly obvious reasons. Explain this ridiculous straw man.

And honestly, people on this very message board use the same sort of language describing God's impending punishment for our acceptance of the gay agenda. This guy's rants seem focused on similar "sins," like drinking and smoking and screwing. I wonder if there was some sexual frustration involved in his selection of a victim, or a perception that the woman in question was a drinker/smoker/promiscuous.
 
Manc Skipper said:
I'm sticking to what is known for now.
Click to expand...

Okay. But heads up (no pun intended) the local police department have called in the FBI to investigate Nolan. If they thought this crime was the result of some disgruntled employee, the FBI would not have been called into the case. According to the police interview what they have discovered about the beheader warranted calling in the FBI.
 
Deuce said:
When a catholic priest molests children, we don't describe people who attended his church as "linked to child molestation."
Click to expand...
Oh for Pete sake, Awlaki a radical Imam and the Boston Marathon Bombers attended a mosque associated with him. The same Awlaki has ties to Oklahoma City.
 
Deuce said:
Literally nobody has called this guy "non violent," for fairly obvious reasons. Explain this ridiculous straw man.

And honestly, people on this very message board use the same sort of language describing God's impending punishment for our acceptance of the gay agenda. This guy's rants seem focused on similar "sins," like drinking and smoking and screwing. I wonder if there was some sexual frustration involved in his selection of a victim, or a perception that the woman in question was a drinker/smoker/promiscuous.
Click to expand...

They were supervisors at the plant he'd just been fired from.
 
vesper said:
Okay. But heads up (no pun intended) the local police department have called in the FBI to investigate Nolan. If they thought this crime was the result of some disgruntled employee, the FBI would not have been called into the case. According to the police interview what they have discovered about the beheader warranted calling in the FBI.
Click to expand...

They would be foolish not to cover all the angles, if only to shut up the baying mob.
 
j-mac said:
The "national uproar" as you put it was brought about by race hustlers, and news outlets bent on promoting the Obama/Holder agenda of racial dividing for political gain. But your question was in why should Obama comment on this situation, and I would say that we have a situation where Obama is now using the Bush doctrine to go after the terror army ISIS, a known morph of AQ, whom he said they had decimated, and all but killed (which was a lie ofcourse). You can find the hypocritical truth of that by simply asking yourself why he doesn't say a thing about the hundreds of black on black shootings of a similar nature in Chicago every year...Not a peep from him on that Nooooo. Why? Because it wouldn't have furthered the false narrative that America is still a racist nation...Which ofcourse is just a cover for him to dodge any criticism for the terrible job he does as President by being able to evoke racism at any criticism.



Man, when you progressives are wrong you are really wrong....

"Washington (CNN) – As terrorism increasingly becomes a tactic of warfare, the number of attacks and fatalities soared to a record high in 2012, according to a new report obtained exclusively by CNN.

More than 8,500 terrorist attacks killed nearly 15,500 people last year as violence tore through Africa, Asia and the Middle East, according to the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism."

Terrorist attacks and deaths hit record high, report shows – CNN Belief Blog - CNN.com Blogs

Now this is the total of murders in the US in a given year...

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Total 15,087 14,916 14,224 13,752 12,996

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: How People Are Murdered in the United States

Now by looking at this even though the numbers are 2012 for terrorism, and 2010 for murders, they represent the latest numbers out by these organizations, and even comparable in amount. But, the number of terrorist killings in the world at this point in time outweighs the number of homicides in the US. So we can conclude about your statement here that either you pulled the number out of your arse, or are just plain out lying about it in order to diminish the state of war Obama has us in today, against the enemy that has called for exactly this scenario to occur. Either way, it is a bogus argument.
Click to expand...

What a silly comparison you made...You are comparing worldwide terrorism with murders in the United States. Make the comparison as I did between international terrorism on U.S. soil, and murders in the United States.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
What a silly comparison you made...You are comparing worldwide terrorism with murders in the United States. Make the comparison as I did between international terrorism on U.S. soil, and murders in the United States.
Click to expand...

Hmm...That's not what you said though.
 
j-mac said:
Hmm...That's not what you said though.
Click to expand...

I stated the following:

"There are an average of 44 murders per day in the United States (by far the highest in the developed world). Everyone of them is a tragedy. Do you want the president to address the nation for each and every one of them? We kill each other in this country at quite a rate. Hell more people die from murder in any given year in this country then terrorists would killed in at least a couple of centuries."

I guess I could have been more clear, but its pretty obvious that when I pointed out the number of Americans in this country murdered every year and compared that to how many terrorism kills, I meant in this country as well.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
I stated the following:

"There are an average of 44 murders per day in the United States (by far the highest in the developed world). Everyone of them is a tragedy. Do you want the president to address the nation for each and every one of them? We kill each other in this country at quite a rate. Hell more people die from murder in any given year in this country then terrorists would killed in at least a couple of centuries."

I guess I could have been more clear, but its pretty obvious that when I pointed out the number of Americans in this country murdered every year and compared that to how many terrorism kills, I meant in this country as well.
Click to expand...

See, even in the portion I bolded here, you still make it vague. You only say compared to how many terrorism kills, not terrorism in America kills, and then at the end you say in this country as well, also giving the impression that you are talking about comparing America to the whole of terrorism...That is what I gave you.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
You do realize Ferguson made international news, and countries had many responses to it right?
Click to expand...
It certainly made international news after Obama took the time to discuss it at the UN. He omitted the ongoing chaos in Chicago though.
 
Grant said:
It certainly made international news after Obama took the time to discuss it at the UN.
Click to expand...

Awwhhhh yes. Obama should of not of talked about it at all! Only once he did, did it become a story! How dare he!
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Awwhhhh yes. Obama should of not of talked about it at all! Only once he did, did it become a story! How dare he!
Click to expand...
Obama is a trivial man, speaking of trivial events but, unfortunately, this trivial man is head of a world superpower. If you believe that the world is interested in the goings on of Ferguson Missouri then you fit right in with his constituency.
 
Grant said:
Obama is a trivial man, speaking of trivial events but, unfortunately, this trivial man is head of a world superpower. If you believe that the world is interested in the goings on of Ferguson Missouri then you fit right in with his constituency.
Click to expand...

So in your opinion Obama should only speak of events you agree with, and if he doesn't its because he is a "trivial man". One time I got speeding ticket! WTF Obama!? Notice also how Obama has not spoken on many "race issue crimes"... But then again you only pick and choose your criticism. You want Obama to speak on this? Again, Ill ask the question, why should he speak on this crime?
 
Did anyone hear what kind of firearm the guy used to stop this filthy son of a whore? Apparently it wasn't something like a .44 magnum or a .45 long colt that might have finished him, right then and there. Too bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom