• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Security breached: Intruder gets into White House

Yep, and we have President Obama to blame for it. I just read in the paper this morning that a bunch of wells have dried up in California and folks are having water trucked in. This kinda stuff didn't happen before that slacker got into office.
(Turns off passive aggressive sarcasm switch)

It was the same thing when Bush was pres, everything was his fault according to liberals. Now the shoe is on the other foot and what goes around comes around. Quit your whining and suck it up boy. You guys can really dish it out but when it's your turn to take it you cry foul.
 
It was the same thing when Bush was pres, everything was his fault according to liberals. Now the shoe is on the other foot and what goes around comes around. Quit your whining and suck it up boy. You guys can really dish it out but when it's your turn to take it you cry foul.

I'm whining? Funny how you got whining out of that. And you are right, many folks did exactly the same thing when GW was in office . . . it wasn't right then either. You justifying it now because of then, and not recognizing the hypocritical nature is very telling.
 
I'm whining? Funny how you got whining out of that. And you are right, many folks did exactly the same thing when GW was in office . . . it wasn't right then either. You justifying it now because of then, and not recognizing the hypocritical nature is very telling.

It is the way it has worked for a very long time and is neither right or wrong, it is just politics. Somehow I seriously doubt you complained about it when Bush was president. I may be wrong and you may not be a liberal but as a rule it is only liberals who whine about things being blamed on Obama just like they were on Bush.
 
Precisely, and this has what to do with the OP? Not a goddam thing, as with the rest of your posts.

Well then you should tell the rest of the posters in the thread too as illegal immigration was brought up and responded to more than once.
 
It is the way it has worked for a very long time and is neither right or wrong, it is just politics. Somehow I seriously doubt you complained about it when Bush was president. I may be wrong and you may not be a liberal but as a rule it is only liberals who whine about things being blamed on Obama just like they were on Bush.

You see . . . the problem is your perception. You keep using that word "Whine". Lighten up . . . I specifically made mention of sarcasm in the post. You seem to be the one whining. Take it easy.
 
That doesn't have anything to so with what I wrote.

Who's losing his/her mind over this?

Everyone that thinks the guy represented a risk or threat.
 
You see . . . the problem is your perception. You keep using that word "Whine". Lighten up . . . I specifically made mention of sarcasm in the post. You seem to be the one whining. Take it easy.

So you are admitting that you did not whine about Bush being blamed for everything like you do with Obama. Bush was a putz and I despised him and enjoyed mocking him endlessly and I will do the same for this stupid, slimy little leftist weasel that now occupies the white house. If it happens on his watch it's his fault. ISIS for example is his creation and saying people blame him for wells drying up in Calif is just a liberal tactic to divert attention from this.
 
Like hell you didn't! Now you're going to try and lie your way out of it?

Show where I specifically said, "apdst wanted the intruder to kill the POTUS". I may have implied it...

If I didn't know better, I'd say you're happy the breech occurred but disappointed the guy didn't reach his target.

...but I haven't accused you of anything except...

...not once have you said "I'm glad the President and the First Family are safe".

In fact, I've given you too much credit here. Going back over your responses in this thread, not once have you even mentioned that you believed the breech was unacceptable. You've gone on and on about border security, defending your character, creating fringe partisan issues and fanning racism, but not once you have spoken directly on the issue of the President's safety or how troubling it is for security to have been breeched at the White House.

So, while you're going on and on about how your character's been called into question or how Liberals get all butt hurt over the simplest things concerning "their guy Barack," or even playing the race card, I say you could have cleared this entire matter up with two simple lines, "No, I don't want the President of the United States dead. I may not like the guy or his policies, but and I'm glad the intruder was caught". But nowhere in this thread you have you even come close to saying that. So, what does that make you? A partisan hack? An antagonist? A hypocrite?

Sure, I call your character into question and rightly so given the breathe of commentary you've lent to this discussion.
 
Last edited:
Show where I specifically said, "apdst wanted the intruder to kill the POTUS". I may have implied it...



...but I haven't accused you of anything except...



In fact, I've given you too much credit here. Going back over your responses in this thread, not once have you even mentioned that you believed the breech was unacceptable. You've gone on and on about border security, defending your character, creating fringe partisan issues and fanning racism, but not once you have spoken directly on the issue of the President's safety or how troubling it is for security to have been breeched at the White House.

So, while you're going on and on about how your character's been called into question or how Liberals get all butt hurt over the simplest things concerning "their guy Barack," or even playing the race card, I say you could have cleared this entire matter up with two simple lines, "No, I don't want the President of the United States dead. I may not like the guy or his policies, but and I'm glad the intruder was caught". But nowhere in this thread you have you even come close to saying that. So, what does that make you? A partisan hack? An antagonist? A hypocrite?

Sure, I call your character into question and rightly so given the breathe of commentary you've lent to this discussion.

You call my character into question, because it's all you have. You're unable to present a rational argument, so you resort to personal attacks. There's nothing about that that comes as a surprise.

I'm not required to qualify my comments you satisfy you. I don't answer to you. Who in the hell do you think you are?
 
Last edited:
You call my character into question, because it's all you have. You're unable to present a rational argument, so you resort to personal attacks. There's nothing about that that comes as a surprise.

I'm not required to qualify my comments you satisfy you. I don't answer to you. Who in the hell do you think you are?

Temper, temper now. Go put your big boy pants on and when you're done throwing a hissy fit come back here and man up.

Back to the thread topic...

Like most people, my first thought was "How in the hell did this guy get that far across the WH lawn and make it to the WH front door?" Somebody was slippin' at their guard post! I'm glad they caught the guy.

After learning he was a Iraq War vet, my heart kinda goes out to him. PTSD, homeless (living out of his truck), broken family (divorcee). Still, whatever grievances this guy might have I'm sure there are much better - and safer - ways to voice his concerns. He's lucky to be alive though. SS should have shot first and asked questions later.
 
Last edited:
Temper, temper now. Go put your big boy pants on and when you're done throwing a hissy fit come back here and man up.

Back to the thread topic...

Like most people, my first thought was "How in the hell did this guy get that far across the WH lawn and make it to the WH front door?" Somebody was slippin' at their guard post! I'm glad they caught the guy.

After learning he was a Iraq War vet, my heart kinda goes out to him. PTSD, homeless (living out of his truck), broken family (divorcee). Still, whatever grievances this guy might have I'm sure there are much better - and safer - ways to voice his concerns. He's lucky to be alive though. SS should have shot first and asked questions later.

You're the one that's all hyped up, my man.
 
Fox News is reporting that 800 rounds of ammo were found in the car of the intruder.
 
Fox News is reporting that 800 rounds of ammo were found in the car of the intruder.

That's going to make the Secret Service even more red-faced.
 
The White House should be.

Should be, it's not and never will be. There are holes and weak points in any security system. This dude found a hole in the White House's security. Look at the bright side: no one got hurr and now the Secret Service can plug the hole.
 
Fox News is reporting that 800 rounds of ammo were found in the car of the intruder.

I wonder if it's true? We know Faux news reports first and verifies later.

800 rounds but no gun? Hmmm...
 
Should be, it's not and never will be. There are holes and weak points in any security system. This dude found a hole in the White House's security. Look at the bright side: no one got hurr and now the Secret Service can plug the hole.

Here, let me correct that spelling error for ya'...

Look at the bright side: no one got hurt and now the Secret Service can plug the hole.

There ya' go. Now I can say, "You did go put on your big boy pants. I'm so proud of you." :applaud
 
It was the same thing when Bush was pres, everything was his fault according to liberals. Now the shoe is on the other foot and what goes around comes around. Quit your whining and suck it up boy. You guys can really dish it out but when it's your turn to take it you cry foul.

And the right are always complaining about us bringing up Bush.
 
He may have.
Meh...no more so than anyone that jumps a fence seeking illegal entrance looking for a better life. As far as I'm concerned, dood should be allowed to live in the living room of the west wing.
 
Should be, it's not and never will be. There are holes and weak points in any security system. This dude found a hole in the White House's security. Look at the bright side: no one got hurr and now the Secret Service can plug the hole.

This should never have happened. He climbed the fence and ran in the unlocked front door? Where were the dogs? This was a total letdown by the security.
 
Of COURSE they are. They are in fact identical. SO why is everyone so freaked out people with needs are upset they are choosing to schale the WH walls?

:lamo
 
Here, let me correct that spelling error for ya'...



There ya' go. Now I can say, "You did go put on your big boy pants. I'm so proud of you." :applaud

You rollin like a big dog with the personal attacks. :lamo
 
This should never have happened. He climbed the fence and ran in the unlocked front door? Where were the dogs? This was a total letdown by the security.

The security detail knew he had infiltrated the groinds the second he crossed the fence, because of motion detecters on the perimeter. You notice he didn't get past the door.
 
Everyone that thinks the guy represented a risk or threat.

Saying "that could have been bad under other circumstances" isn't losing your mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom