So either stop trying to use Jefferson for supporting what is at best a naïve ideology, or accept that it leads to all sorts of absurdities -- like slavery.
Indeed, there is absolutely nothing in anarchistic libertarianism to prevent slavery. And indeed, even in "mainstream" libertarianism wage slavery is not only tolerated, but defended.
Since libertarianism has no coherent concept of capital and how it relates to liberty, it's basically adolescent.
Now, some people call themselves "libertarians" and it really means something innocuous like not legislating personal choices, such as drug use and abortion. That's harmless, if mildly coherent. But that's not what the ideological libertarians are about.
Second of all, you're rambling on about something you don't really understand all that well. If you notice, my lean is Libertarian - Left and I have a Noam Chomsky quote explaining libertarian socialism as my signature. I'm very obviously not a supporter of wage slavery or other capitalist systems of oppression. Nor does libertarianism presuppose such systems.
In a vain attempt to keep this thread from being hijacked, I started another on libertarianism.
It is here (What is a libertarian, anyway?).
Can't we just turn Congress off and then turn it back on again?
As to the rest -- a nonresponse. Something I've learned to expect from libertarians. You simply have no theory regarding capital, making libertarianism a joke. It has nothing to say (except minor practical arguments like decriminalizing pot; hardly a important political theory)