• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Adrian Peterson indicted in child injury case in Texas

Now I have yes. They are not good.

Even if there were not pics, your claim of gold digging is BS because a doctor reported it to the police.
 
Dont take this the wrong way, but what are the odds that you might do something that (justifiably or not) ends up with you spending a significant time in prison anytime soon, and is there any way we can hasten that along?

Can't give you the exact odds.........but I would advise you to not bet on it in Vegas.......odds are greater that I will be on a Carribean vacation in the near future. Have a nice day.
 
Even if there were not pics, your claim of gold digging is BS because a doctor reported it to the police.

I didn't claim anything. Look again. I threw it out there with a ?

This is what I said...

Gold digging? Hard to say.

That is NOT a claim.
 
I didn't claim anything. Look again. I threw it out there with a ?

This is what I said...



That is NOT a claim.


Yes, well the doctor having reported it, and not the mother, should have clued you in to the fact that it could not be gold digging.
 
Yes, well the doctor having reported it, and not the mother, should have clued you in to the fact that it could not be gold digging.

LOL. Is that your "claim"? Seriously, just admit you were wrong and move along.
 
LOL. Is that your "claim"? Seriously, just admit you were wrong and move along.

I believe it was stupid to suggest gold digging given a doctor reported it. I'm not sure what else to tell you.
 
I believe it was stupid to suggest gold digging given a doctor reported it. I'm not sure what else to tell you.

You said I made a claim. You were wrong.
 
You said I made a claim. You were wrong.

:screwy

You made a stupid claim (that it might be gold digging), or if you would prefer we'll call it a suggestion. One might venture to say, given a doctor reported it, that your 'suggested possibility' was moronic.

Did you or did you not claim it might be gold digging?

Is or is not that claim moronic, just based on the info in the OP?


Please explain to us how she could get a practicing doctor to commit fraud of this sort in order to get kickbacks in the scheme. :roll: Idiocy.
 
Last edited:
20 years ago, it would have been laughable to call this child abuse.
 
20 years ago, it would have been laughable to call this child abuse.

20 years ago, those pics would have resulted in an investigation.
 

What a friggin dirtbag. I spank my child. This isn't spanking. That is beating/torture. If a person "spanks" their child hard enough to leave welts and scabs, it's beyond spanking at that point. As big as Peterson is, he could probably spank his child one time with his hand on the behind and that would be plenty. Whenever a foreign object is brought into spanking, it isn't spanking anymore IMO. Yes, that includes a belt. Spanking isn't something that should be done daily or even every other day. Spanking is a last resort thing that should be done when a child disobeys an order given by their parent that could result in them being seriously hurt. Example, I have spanked (one hit, with my hand, on the butt) my son for running out from between two cars in a parking lot.
 
Last edited:
claim

state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.

https://www.google.com/#q=claim

Show me where I did such a thing?


You claimed it could be money grabbing (not that it was, that it could be). That claim is clearly stupid because a doctor reported it. Just admit you didn't read the OP carefully and you made a stupid claim. Stop making yourself look foolish.
 
I posed a question. That is not a claim. Simple English.

You claimed it was hard to say whether or not it was money grabbing. That claim is stupid. You failed to read the OP. End of story.
 
You claimed it was hard to say whether or not it was money grabbing. That claim is stupid. You failed to read the OP. End of story.

Your grasp of the English language is rivaling Travis'.
 
Your grasp of the English language is rivaling Travis'.

If you insist, I'll continue to point out how moronic your claim was.

Gold digging? Hard to say.

The ex wife...lawsuit.

Clearly, you're claiming it's possible. Claiming it is possible is -in fact- moronic. Just read the OP, note the part where the doctor reported it (not the mother) and your suspicions of money grabbing become the idiocy the rest of us can already see.

There was one other person that made that claim. They, unlike you, are capable of realizing their mistake. That's why they liked this post:

Gold digging doesn't work anyway because the doctor reported it, not the mother.


But you? No. You can't admit you made a stupid claim because you didn't carefully read the OP. You're stuck in denial and some kind of BS competition that you've no business in. So please, do us all a favor and figure out it's ****ing moronic to claim money grabbing is possible when the doctor reported it to the police.
 
If you insist, I'll continue to point out how moronic your claim was.





Clearly, you're claiming it's possible. Claiming it is possible is -in fact- moronic. Just read the OP, note the part where the doctor reported it (not the mother) and your suspicions of money grabbing become the idiocy the rest of us can already see.

There was one other person that made that claim. They, unlike you, are capable of realizing their mistake. That's why they liked this post:




But you? No. You can't admit you made a stupid claim because you didn't carefully read the OP. You're stuck in denial and some kind of BS competition that you've no business in. So please, do us all a favor and figure out it's ****ing moronic to claim money grabbing is possible when the doctor reported it to the police.

So now you are going the out of context route? Seriously?
 
So now you are going the out of context route? Seriously?

What?

Where is the malfunction. You claimed it was possible that this was money grabbing. As the doctor reported it, it's NOT POSSIBLE - stupid claim.
 
20 years ago, those pics would have resulted in an investigation.

Maybe. Maybe not. After they saw it was an isolated incident of going overboard with a spanking, it would have been dropped.

I, my parents, my grandparents, and every kid I grew up with were apparently abused as a child.

This is obviously an issue where people have different opinions and I certainly don't think anyone needs to spank their child..but in the culture I grew up in (I'm only 28), calling this child abuse WOULD have been laughable. Why there is a culturally acceptable place to hit a child and unacceptable places to hit children, I can't explain, but it's still a thing.
 
I, my parents, my grandparents, and every kid I grew up with were apparently abused as a child.

I'm sorry to hear that. Fortunately, I and many others did not suffer such. Even more fortunately, society has progressed to the point where many would-be abusers have heard and understand the impacts of physical abuse against children.

I hope that you don't still have problems to get through because of your abuse, and I hope you have or will fully recover from being treated like an animal by animals.
 
And how the hell can Greg Hardy of Carolina be suiting up to play after his CONVICTION? The stuff he did sounds far worse than one KO punch.

If he is found guilty he needs to be kicked to the curb too, but the guilt of Rice is beyond any doubt. Also, it sounds like he lied to the league about the extend of his crime and now has been found out.++
 
None of the NFL's business (yes, I realize contractually it is, but it should not be).

This is between Peterson, the boy, his family and the police...at least until Peterson is convicted (if he ever is).

And it is innocent until proven guilty.

Peterson has an iffy past but it is possible the boy's parents are simply con artist's looking for a lawsuit settlement.

The bottom line...let the court's figure this out.

But the NFL did not suspend him or anything, I think his team benched him (maybe to protect their own image or to protect the player from verbal abuse).
 
Back
Top Bottom