- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,305
- Reaction score
- 10,606
- Location
- US Southwest
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
I agree, tautology is self serving and rhetorical questions are not meant to be answered.Non answer.
What did you expect?
I agree, tautology is self serving and rhetorical questions are not meant to be answered.Non answer.
Really? Show me where I typed your name in the post, or did I start out saying liberal progressives in the general.? Threatening anyone would be a pretty severe rules infraction, so if you feel I did that click that report button.Perhaps you DID NOT read your OWN WORDS in the very post that I printed them in that you just used to springboard to this post from you?
Now how could that even be possible?
I was talking about politicians getting payback and you attempted to tell me I would be squealing for mercy when the GOP took over.
get real here.
I've learned to expect little, and am frequently correct in that.I agree, tautology is self serving and rhetorical questions are not meant to be answered.
What did you expect?
You should then set your aim higher...like not rely upon tautology and rhetorical questions when attempting to counter fact based argument.I've learned to expect little, and am frequently correct in that.
Really? Show me where I typed your name in the post, or did I start out saying liberal progressives in the general.? Threatening anyone would be a pretty severe rules infraction, so if you feel I did that click that report button.
Originally Posted by haymarket
sorry - do not know who he is.
I guess the prospect of the chickens coming home to roost is causing some on the right cause for concern.
It's not my aim that needs adjustment.You should then set your aim higher...like not rely upon tautology and rhetorical questions when attempting to counter fact based argument.
Nothing comes of nothing.
So you don't understand using "you" in the rhetorical eh? And need it spelled out for you right? And with that precisely clear point I am done with this track. Move on.sure. here is your post 110 - it begins with YOU reproducing a post from ME with my name on it and then you talking to me about it.
j-mac post 110:
______________________________________________________________________
Mike Malloy Radio Show : Progressive Radio : Online Video Streaming : The Best In Nighttime Liberal Talk! M-F 9pm-12am.
He is a detestable little P.O.S. out of Atlanta that has a show on XM/Sirus' progressive talk channel...Just another flame thrower with no class that thinks that using profanity, and threats against his political opponents is what wins the arguments....
and again from ME
It ought to be cause for liberal progressives to worry...When repubs gain back total control over federal power, and they will, then some of the same crap that people like you cheered on while it was your hero's doing it, will have you squealing for mercy when it is used against you.
____________________________________________________________________
I guess threatening to take actions which will make me "squealing for mercy" is not a threat in the world you inhabit - but it certainly is in the real world where I live.
Anytime you wish to get back to facts and figures, lemme know, because this childish path you have set course upon is getting you nowhere.It's not my aim that needs adjustment.
I thought I made that very point earlier.Anytime you wish to get back to facts and figures, lemme know, because this childish path you have set course upon is getting you nowhere.
Fixed it for you.I thought I imagined that very point earlier.
So you don't understand using "you" in the rhetorical eh?
Changing other people's posts is very dishonest.Fixed it for you.
Responding to the decline of the Old White Party (shown by US demographics) with Minute Man rhetoric is pointless, the boat has sailed and alienating a potential voting block (Hispanics are culturally conservative) is not smart. Last year you guys actually did a half-way decent analysis of the issue facing your party, you even had Marco as the point man, but since then the extremists (like yourself) have forced any and all immigration discussion back to pre-2012 rhetoric.
Myself, as a liberal, I'm good with that....go on with your bad self.
How could I be mad at your own ignorance? I just shake my head and move on. Something clearly you just can't do.So YOU is not really YOU in that you were talking to ME about ME "squealing for mercy" and that is somehow my fault taht I cannot read the twisted workings of your mind?
Unbelivable. :doh:roll:
You are just angry that your mouth overloaded your sense and you got caught at it. :lamo
Oh, the vapors!Changing other people's posts is very dishonest.
Nope, just pointing out your error.Oh, the vapors!
Once again, instead of getting back to the meat of the debate.....you seek to find distraction.
FFS, you don't even see the irony of your post! Once again, YOU are not focusing on fact based argument....instead you have focused on rhetoric and whining about quotes.Nope, just pointing out your error.
How could I be mad at your own ignorance? I just shake my head and move on. Something clearly you just can't do.
Just acknowledge your error and we can move on.FFS, you don't even see the irony of your post! Once again, YOU are not focusing on fact based argument....instead you have focused on rhetoric and whining about quotes.
You are not winning the argument by avoiding it.
:lamo oh my...I have rarely seen an example of somebody who allowed their own partisan vitriol to overload their mouth causing them to make statements that clearly pushed them over the line the way that you did. And your sad and pathetic effort to dry and dig yourself out of the deep abyss you created for yourself only compounds your sins.
It wasn't an "error", you imagine that you wanted to get back to discussing facts and figures, whereas in reality you never began to discuss the facts and figures of the declining support for the GOP due to their (and your) continuing xenophobic Minuteman alienating rhetoric.Just acknowledge your error and we can move on.
:lamo oh my...
Where is the DOUBLE part you mentioned?
It doesn't change the argument much, since again, this is not "75% of independent disagree", plus, the GOP can "win" the Independents... and lose the election.
....We are talking about a single issue. An issue on which a broad majority of Americans agree with the basic GOP premise and disagree with the President. You can try to find any silver lining you like, but those remain the basic realities. As I demonstrated for you, and as you ignored.
Nope. Not gonna feed the troll.