• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209:785]

shrubnose

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
19,463
Reaction score
8,732
Location
Europe
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
A police report on the death of Michael Brown is missing key information and violates Missouri open records laws, an ACLU attorney told Yahoo news on Friday.

Read the article here: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael Brown's death violates law


Eventually all of the facts will come out because the ACLU will insist on that.

But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?
It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.




You don't have to assume anything.

All you have to do is take a look at the duplicitous report that the Ferguson police put out to see that there's a cover-up going on.

Eventually (At the trials maybe.) all of the facts will come out.
 
Last edited:
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

From that article, it seems some very important information is missing. I hope they will be compelled to provide it during the grand jury.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.

Many journalists have attempted to figure out the timeline, but it is virtually impossible because of the lack of cooperation and available information from local agencies.

Did Wilson report the incident? We can't determine that for sure.
Why did the police chief release false information regarding the robbery? Who knows, he later redacted it.
Why is there no record of the event in the daily logs? Seems rather fishy to me.
Why have the protesters been harassed and arrested? Perhaps they're being unlawful, perhaps not.
Why are so many journalists being harassed and their movements curtailed? Who knows.

When the details of an event such as this are shrouded in secrecy, it all but ensures that assumptions of a coverup will be made.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

The misinformation flying around in this case is astounding. We've had it reported that this was an execution in the streets of a gentle giant to a cop with no choice but to shoot him dead.

And the worst part is it's the so called news media doing it. They will put absolutely anything out there.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

A police report on the death of Michael Brown is missing key information and violates Missouri open records laws, an ACLU attorney told Yahoo news on Friday.


But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?

A murder.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

You don't have to assume anything.

All you have to do is take a look at the duplicitous report that the Ferguson police put out to see that there's a cover-up going on.

Eventually (At the trials maybe.) all of the facts will come out.
:laughat: Duplicitous report? Ha, ha, ha!

It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Many journalists have attempted to figure out the timeline, but it is virtually impossible because of the lack of cooperation and available information from local agencies.
It is irrelevant what they can or can not figure out.

Did Wilson report the incident? We can't determine that for sure.
Reaslly? ilol :doh
Of course he did.


Why did the police chief release false information regarding the robbery? Who knows, he later redacted it.
What false info? And what was redacted?


Why is there no record of the event in the daily logs? Seems rather fishy to me.
Wtf?


Why have the protesters been harassed and arrested? Perhaps they're being unlawful, perhaps not.
Oh geez! :doh


Why are so many journalists being harassed and their movements curtailed? Who knows.
Journalists are part of the problem in enforcing order. They do not get to act with impunity just because they are the press. They too must remain orderly and follow direction. But that has nothing to do with this at all.

:laughat:
When the details of an event such as this are shrouded in secrecy, it all but ensures that assumptions of a coverup will be made.
No. :naughty Simply no.
They are not shrouded, we know many things.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

:laughat: Duplicitous report? Ha, ha, ha!

It is ridiculous to assume anything is being hidden.




You don't have to assume anything, just look at the report that the cops put out.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

You don't have to assume anything, just look at the report that the cops put out.
And? You have nothing there.
Nor could you point to anything there.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

And? You have nothing there.
Nor could you point to anything there.
Nobody can point to much.There is almost nothing there...
1-e7646fdcb1.jpg

They know there was a murder so they aren't saying anything.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

And? You have nothing there.
Nor could you point to anything there.

Of course there's nothing there, they censored it!
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

A police report on the death of Michael Brown is missing key information and violates Missouri open records laws, an ACLU attorney told Yahoo news on Friday.

Read the article here: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael Brown's death violates law


Eventually all of the facts will come out because the ACLU will insist on that.

But the question right now is: what are the Ferguson police trying to hide?

The ACLU is hit and miss half the time they get it right the other half they are ridiculously wrong.

Not exactly trustworthy legal experts
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Nobody can point to much.There is almost nothing there...
View attachment 67171832

They know there was a murder so they aren't saying anything.

How do you know there was a murder with no evidence of one.

It is possible they have evidence of murder but equally likely they have evidence proving that the shooting was justified.

Where do you get your insight? ESP?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

With nothing in the report, there is nothing they need to defend.

It is a stonewall defense that reeks of guilt.

Anything they say will point to murder ... so to protect the murderer ... they say nothing.

It reminds me of Nixon's eighteen and a half minute gap...
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

How do you know there was a murder with no evidence of one.

It is possible they have evidence of murder but equally likely they have evidence proving that the shooting was justified.

Where do you get your insight? ESP?
If there was evidence for justification they would have put that in the report.
It was a murder.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Of course there's nothing there, they censored it!
Both pages even. St. Louis County Police Department report also. iLOL

That's funny.

Exactly what the trolls of the ACLU deserve.
 
Last edited:
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

With nothing in the report, there is nothing they need to defend.

It is a stonewall defense that reeks of guilt.
Anything they say will point to murder ... so to protect the murderer ... they say nothing.
You have no evidence to back up your absurd claims.
And they are absurd, considering most of all the other evidence points to his being justified.
Nothing is going to change that evidence.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

How do you know there was a murder with no evidence of one.

It is possible they have evidence of murder but equally likely they have evidence proving that the shooting was justified.

Where do you get your insight? ESP?

Well let's see the whole director's cut/uncensored/unrated report first then we decide. I think thats the most important issue at this pint.

EDIT: Oops I said pint instead of point. Thats what you get from too much beer. :beer:
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

If there was evidence for justification they would have put that in the report.
It was a murder.

Wrong they have reason to keep ANY evidence of either claim confidential until the investigation is complete .

You claim is a lie
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Both pages even. St. Louis County Police Department report also. iLOL

That's funny.

Exactly what the trolls of the ACLU deserve.

Yeah, I think, maybe (just maybe) it's because the Ferguson PD handed it over to the St. Louis County police, almost immediately?

:lol:

It's also adorable how Buck Ewer feels the need to endlessly repeat "murder," as some kind of self-assurance that the evil white racist executioner cop will be convicted. Let's let the evidence and trial decide, shall we?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

You have no evidence to back up your absurd claims.
And they are absurd, considering most of all the other evidence points to his being justified.
Nothing is going to change that evidence.
All the evidence points to a pissed off, out of control cop ready to exact a lethal vengeance on an un-armed black kid who disrespected him and caused him to bump his head on his own car door.
All the evidence shows that the unarmed black kid was executed as he lay face down in the street with a final shot to the top of his head.
Murder.
 
Back
Top Bottom