• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209:785]

re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

All the evidence points to a pissed off, out of control cop ready to exact a lethal vengeance on an un-armed black kid who disrespected him and caused him to bump his head on his own car door.
All the evidence shows that the unarmed black kid was executed as he lay face down in the street with a final shot to the top of his head.
Murder.

Let me guess Buck, you still think OJ is innocent and was framed? Also the moon landing was faked. Im glad you're not a prosecuting attorney.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Well said.

In fairness though, it is very, very possible that Brown was a willing participant in a macho contest with the police officer that then escalated very quickly. In contrast to CNN's communiques of the gentle giant, Brown's actions dont potray him as one. Gentle Giants dont:...
-pose with mouthfuls of money while holding a pistol
That photo circulated widely was not a picture of Michael Brown. It was actually of Oregon murder suspect Joda Cain
Photo of Portland suspect mistaken for Michael Brown
JODAH CAIN INSTAGRAM 1 (2).jpgimages (15).jpg
Cain..........................................................................................................................Brown
Different guy.
You have fallen for part of the smoke-screen of lies released to the press.

Gentle giant or not ...no one deserves to be executed while surrendering to the police
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Different guy.
You have fallen for part of the smoke-screen of lies released to the press.

Yikes, I have. though that still leaves the strong arm robbery and the perfectly legal, but dominance expressing "My ** is on your tounge" rap lyrics.

Gentle giant or not ...no one deserves to be executed while surrendering to the police

I agree, that is the core point.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Let me guess Buck, you still think OJ is innocent and was framed? Also the moon landing was faked. Im glad you're not a prosecuting attorney.
No. As a matter of fact I believe that OJ murdered Nicole and her boyfriend and that Buzz and Neil were the first humans to walk on the moon.
Any other misconceptions of me you would like to have me clear up?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Yikes, I have. though that still leaves the strong arm robbery and the perfectly legal, but dominance expressing "My ** is on your tounge" rap lyrics.



I agree, that is the core point.
Yes .
Performing bad rap lyrics and shoplifting are not capital offences either.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

No. As a matter of fact I believe that OJ murdered Nicole and her boyfriend and that Buzz and Neil were the first humans to walk on the moon.
Any other misconceptions of me you would like to have me clear up?

But yet he was found innocent, and he is black and killed 2 white people. So do you believe OJ was found innocent only because he was a black?

Or do you think he was found innocent because of the media pressures and the rioting and charges of racism?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

But yet he was found innocent, and he is black and killed 2 white people. So do you believe OJ was found innocent only because he was a black?

Or do you think he was found innocent because of the media pressures and the rioting and charges of racism?
I believe OJ was found not guilty because of bad police work and a brilliant defense team.
This thread is not about OJ or the moon landing.
 
Last edited:
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

I believe OJ was found not guilty because of bad police work and a brilliant defense team.
This thread is not about OJ or the moon landing.

Really because I think the real reason he was found innocent is because the media circus and the roits that ensued, which intimidated the jury. And this seems to be the same MO in these numerous threads about this incident.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Really because I think the real reason he was found innocent is because the media circus and the roits that ensued, which intimidated the jury. And this seems to be the same MO in these numerous threads about this incident.
No one is found "innocent" in court. OJ was found not guilty because he could afford one of the most brilliant defense teams ever assembled and the police badly botched the evidence.
Your concerns are bogus. There were no riots when Zimmerman walked.
The people of Ferguson only want justice to be served in the form of an indictment, a charge and a trial.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

The Cardinals are away in Pennsylvania all weekend so a baseball game is out of the question.
Maybe he will go up in the arch... I hear the view is spectacular.
View attachment 67171835

Been there and done that, TDY @ Scott AFB, St Louis is a beautiful city.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

:laughat:
You have unfairly and illegally edited my quote to make it sound like I am saying that the man in the recording fabricated his story...
Not nice.
Here is the accurate quote;

The "fabrication" refers to those who WOULD say that he ran head down towards Wilson... Not what that witness said.

How does it feel? You have unfairly and illegally defamed the officer by your conviction of murder who, by the way, hasn't even been charged yet.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

How can anyone be shot into the very top of their head, entering their brain and lodging at the front of the brain, if they are shot from the front?
Magic bullet?

Because he may well have been running towards the officer as the officer stated.

No magic there.

It would be much more magical to claim he was shot while in a prone position and none of the witnsses saw that particular detail
 
Last edited:
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

All the evidence points to a pissed off, out of control cop ready to exact a lethal vengeance on an un-armed black kid who disrespected him and caused him to bump his head on his own car door.
All the evidence shows that the unarmed black kid was executed as he lay face down in the street with a final shot to the top of his head.
Murder.

If the cop really did that, he would have had zero reason to keep the (to him only) eye witness, the gentle giant's friend, alive. Someone that is going to really shoot ome guy lying in the street and surrendering won't have any qualms about shooting the guy near him that can get him into big trouble.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

There is evidence that Brown was moving towards Wilson. I have always accepted that. . There is no evidence that he was rushing at Wilson and that is the only scenario that claims that Brown could have been a threat.
The autopsy says he was facing the officer when he was HIT by most of the shots. One of the wounds that grazed his arm could have been inflicted either facing away or towards Wilson. That fact was reported in Baden's press conference about the autopsy.
There are six confirmed shots that hit Wilson. Witness accounts say there could have been as many as ten shots fired and we know at least one hit a house across the street. Wilson could have been shooting and missing with most shots as the kid ran away.
Johnson's account is consistent with all the evidence that Wilson was shooting and Brown was hit while running away from Wilson and that when Brown surrendered Wilson kept shooting.

None of the evidence is consistent with that claim.

We only know six shots hit Brown we do not know if any others were fired we do not know any other shots went any where else.

The wounds could have been caused as he was holding his hands up in surrender or while bent forward in a run.

The fact that one bullet went through the lower arm and into the shoule is consistent with that but not with surrendering.

The evidence is too incomplete as I have been saying all along. Not only are you personally declaring murder without evidence you are tisting the evidence to make it fit
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

You don't know many nineteen year olds do you.





Absolutely false premise. Let a lawyer explain this concept to you;

Innocent until proven guilty? - Avvo.com

I know far more of them than you probably.

WIlson is innocent until proven guilty and your declerations are false
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

If the cop really did that, he would have had zero reason to keep the (to him only) eye witness, the gentle giant's friend, alive. Someone that is going to really shoot ome guy lying in the street and surrendering won't have any qualms about shooting the guy near him that can get him into big trouble.

One murder is difficult enough to cover up, let alone two. Besides, the pig pretty much emptied his piece shooting Brown, are we suggesting he should have reloaded and kept on killing?
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

This thread is hilarious... everyone seems to think they know all the evidence in this case from what they read or hear from the media...:lamo too funny :lamo

And an eye witness to the entire encounter! Don't forget that.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Because he may well have been running towards the officer as the officer stated.

No magic there.

It would be much more magical to claim he was shot while in a prone position and none of the witnsses saw that particular detail

No necessarily. Have you seen how a football player runs when they are tackling the ball carrier? Their torso is tilted forward to at least a 45 degree angle.

If Brown was rushing the cop, this may have been his body position.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

One murder is difficult enough to cover up, let alone two. Besides, the pig pretty much emptied his piece shooting Brown, are we suggesting he should have reloaded and kept on killing?

He did not empty his piece at all or pretty much.

Most police carry fifteen round magazines 6 is not even half of that.

If murder is so hard to cover up why would one try to commit murder?

You are speculating which can be done all day. Wait for the evidence
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

No necessarily. Have you seen how a football player runs when they are tackling the ball carrier? Their torso is tilted forward to at least a 45 degree angle.

If Brown was rushing the cop, this may have been his body position.

That's what I have been saying all along
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

One murder is difficult enough to cover up, let alone two. Besides, the pig pretty much emptied his piece shooting Brown, are we suggesting he should have reloaded and kept on killing?

One murder becomes much easier to cover-up when the only other eye witness is dead.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

Suppose Wilson would have pulled up along side the two young men and said, "hey fellas, can I get ya'll to move onto the sidewalk". I remember a day when the police officer respected the public, and often they still do. But often they don't. The police should want to keep the peace, not aggravate hostility. Rolling your window down and saying, "get the **** on the sidewalk", isn't defusing at all.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

That's what I have been saying all along

Oh. Right. I think I may have quoted the wrong post. Ooops.
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

There are no witness accounts that describe Brown as running towards Wilson with his head down.
That is an often repeated fabrication not based on any witnesses account of what they saw.

There are no confirmed witnesses at all only ALLEGED witnesses. Other than Johnson who has as much credibility as a Manson family member.

I never said any witnesses saw that but some alleged witnesses HAVE supported the officers supposed version and stated that Brown was rushing him.

Lowering one's head and bending over IS normal in a rush or running toward something.

It is not a fabrication at all laying prone is a fabrication
 
re: ACLU: Ferguson police report on Michael brown's death violates law [W: 209]

:laughat:

How does it feel? You have unfairly and illegally defamed the officer by your conviction of murder who, by the way, hasn't even been charged yet.
If you like I can quote and edit your post for content and change the meaning if you really want to know how it feels.
IMHO Wilson defamed himself when he executed and unarmed teen who was surrendering.
I haven't "convicted" anyone. I offer my opinion of his guilt based on the evidence I have seen read and heard.
There is nothing illegal or unfair in that exercise of my first amendment right.
My hope is that Wilson is charged so that the justice system can take it's course.
What would be unjust is if he isn't charged with the evidence known and presented.
 
Back
Top Bottom