So what? The cop who shot and killed Brown knew nothing about this at the time of the shooting so it won't be a factor at any trial that is held.
I doubt that will be seen as a valid reason to shoot him 6-times and kill him.
Not that this is about Bundy, if only to show the hypocrisy in those in here applying a false narrative in this case. There is no evidence that Bundy knew, or ordered anyone to pose as sniper at law enforcement on that bridge, or that the person that the media was drooling over as a pawn in their furtherance of their narrative at the time was even there as a sniper, or pointing at Federal LE.
But it is striking though, how people that want us all to so believe that this case in MO. is so based in racist hate, that a cop just executes 'an angel of a young black boy who wouldn't hurt a flea' ... When in reality he was an 18 year old, drug abusing, thug that thought that he was big enough to even attack a cop and get away with it...I've seen Brown's type before, going through life bullying people to get what he wants, defying authority, on a path to end up in jail or dead. Now for his mother's sake I am saddened for her that it was the latter, however, in Brown's case, he picked the wrong target to attempt to intimidate....And now the left, and media have their story to further the disgusting false narrative of racial tensions in this country. It is truly sad, just as the hypocritical douche bags that further the divide, and exploit it.
Just pointing out the hypocrisy out there.
There's enough of that to go around, No?
CNN has ethics and gravitas.
Always.
And it should always be pointed out. No?
So the CNN "anonymous" source contradicts this source. Well how about if we let the jury decide?
CNN has ethics and gravitas.
Hoft is the stupidest man on the internet.
I doubt that will be seen as a valid reason to shoot him 6-times and kill him.
So what? The cop who shot and killed Brown knew nothing about this at the time of the shooting so it won't be a factor at any trial that is held.
Hey, does anyone else remember last year when CNN was the butt of jokes from everyone from Jon Stewart to the AP for ****ing up the reporting from the Boston bombing?
Blazing headline on channel and on the internet:
Arrest made in Boston bombing! (according to "sources")
Anderson Cooper reports this on air - woohoo all is good, we got the guy!
WAIT! Hold on, now sources say no arrest was made
Wait, they have a suspect but no name yet
Okay, hold on, no suspect, no name
Wait, now the Administration and other Federal official say no arrest, no
This was even better than when they ****ed up in 2012 on the SCOTUS ruling on the individual mandate:
Mandate ruled unconstitutional! Obamacare in big trouble!
Wait...hold on
Hold a minute, it looks like our sources are wrong....
Yeah, CNN never gets it wrong.
All news outlets can get it wrong from time to time, its the risk of trying to be the first one out. At least CNN isn't filled with opinion!
The Project on Excellence in Journalism report in 2006 showed that 68 percent of Fox cable stories contained personal opinions, as compared to MSNBC at 27 percent and CNN at 4 percent. The "content analysis" portion of their 2005 report also concluded that "Fox was measurably more one-sided than the other networks, and Fox journalists were more opinionated on the air."[43]
Fox News Channel controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All news outlets can get it wrong from time to time, its the risk of trying to be the first one out. At least CNN isn't filled with opinion!
The Project on Excellence in Journalism report in 2006 showed that 68 percent of Fox cable stories contained personal opinions, as compared to MSNBC at 27 percent and CNN at 4 percent. The "content analysis" portion of their 2005 report also concluded that "Fox was measurably more one-sided than the other networks, and Fox journalists were more opinionated on the air."[43]
Fox News Channel controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hate to tell you, but guess who ultimately owns both places the fellow who started The Project on Excellence in Journalism worked for years - Ted Turner.
Oh, there's plenty more.
Fox News' year in apologies: Fake videos, false info, cutting and pasting from GOP
Research November 19, 2009 5:54 PM EST ››› ERIC HANANOKI
On November 19, co-host Jane Skinner apologized for Happening Now "mistakenly" airing a fake video of Sarah Palin's book tour "crowds." This was not the first time Fox News has apologized for airing fake videos and false information.
All news outlets can get it wrong from time to time, its the risk of trying to be the first one out. At least CNN isn't filled with opinion!
The Project on Excellence in Journalism report in 2006 showed that 68 percent of Fox cable stories contained personal opinions, as compared to MSNBC at 27 percent and CNN at 4 percent. The "content analysis" portion of their 2005 report also concluded that "Fox was measurably more one-sided than the other networks, and Fox journalists were more opinionated on the air."[43]
Fox News Channel controversies - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Oh, there's plenty more.
Fox News' year in apologies: Fake videos, false info, cutting and pasting from GOP
Research November 19, 2009 5:54 PM EST ››› ERIC HANANOKI
On November 19, co-host Jane Skinner apologized for Happening Now "mistakenly" airing a fake video of Sarah Palin's book tour "crowds." This was not the first time Fox News has apologized for airing fake videos and false information.
Fox News' year in apologies: Fake videos, false info, cutting and pasting from GOP | Research | Media Matters for America
2006? Good grief, that was 8 years ago.
Yes, a lot of Fox on air correspondents have opinions. And lots express their opinions. And? Has nothing to do with CNN being the be all, end all of accuracy, as implied in the OP.
Well goodness, that's really relevant to the discussion. Or not.