We do have two conflicting unnamed sources. By themselves, we would have to compare the sources citing the unnamed sources and maybe go with the credibility of those "news" entities. Like, is this the National Enquirer vs. The Christian Science Monitor.
But, we don't just have the news entity sources, we have a couple other facts. One, the fact that one news entity source tried to dupe its true believers into believing it had an X-ray of the orbital fracture break. This gives an indication as to who is trying to deceive about this detail. And two, we do have neighbors saying that they saw Dan Wilson mowing his lawn a couple days later. And injury like that, you don't mow you lawn, it just doesn't happen.
We still don't know whether Wilson was beaten. But, I do think we know there was no orbital fracture.
You can never be safe from a government that can keep you completely safe from each other and the world. You must choose.
"you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
The only people who would know if he had an orbital fracture are Wilson, his doctor, and anyone exempt from HIPPA(i.e. law enforcement)
doubt we ever find out what injuries he had, if any
swollen face, big deal