- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown[W:150]
You think you did because you do not understand the information you are providing.
1.) You have not provided any information that says he was shot in the back of the head. I used your own source to prove you wrong on that.
2.) You clearly do not understand what you have read. This was also shown.
Doctor Baden and the professor both say that all shots were from the front. Which I already showed.
Then I even provided an explanation of what is meant be the Professor himself. And yet you continue to make false claims.
You are wrong and have been shown to be wrong.
If you would bother to pay attention you would understand where you fail.
The forensics expert said all shots came from the front.
The two shots that hit Brown in the head were likely among the last that hit him and traveled from the back of his head to the front,
The above is not the same as saying he was shot in the back of the head. As we already know they didn't say he was.
They made it clear as day that all shots came while Brown was facing the Officer. And that travel is what happened after entry.
Why do you not understand that?
The information form the examiners was provided telling you exactly that and how the bullet traveled once it entered the body from him facing the Officer.
You are telling untruths and have shown no such thing.I did not leave out relevant information. We are arguing about whether or not Brown was shot in the back of the head twice. I have provided 3 separate sources showing this occurred. Why are you unable to refute the evidence?
You think you did because you do not understand the information you are providing.
1.) You have not provided any information that says he was shot in the back of the head. I used your own source to prove you wrong on that.
2.) You clearly do not understand what you have read. This was also shown.
Doctor Baden and the professor both say that all shots were from the front. Which I already showed.
Then I even provided an explanation of what is meant be the Professor himself. And yet you continue to make false claims.
You are wrong and have been shown to be wrong.
If you would bother to pay attention you would understand where you fail.
That's what the forensic expert said. It's in the article. Take it or leave it.
The two shots that hit Brown in the head were likely among the last that hit him and traveled from the back of his head to the front,
The above is not the same as saying he was shot in the back of the head. As we already know they didn't say he was.
They made it clear as day that all shots came while Brown was facing the Officer. And that travel is what happened after entry.
Why do you not understand that?
The information form the examiners was provided telling you exactly that and how the bullet traveled once it entered the body from him facing the Officer.