If Michael Brown had been white, just assaulted a store clerk during a robbery and then assaulted the police officer that shot him....would you guys also automatically assume the cop was guilty of murder?
A man without fear is a fool, a man that succumbs to his fear is a coward and a brave man acknowledges fear yet presses on.
The opposite of hero is not villain, it is "bystander"
" In doing what we ought we deserve no praise, because it is our duty." -Aurelius Augustine
"But why do they use them to make Brawndo??!!"
Secondly, what you have said is contradicted by actual eyewitness account.
Nothing you can or could suggest can change that.
Brown was running at the Officer when the Officer was firing at him.
Again, nothing can change that account accept the witness.
And on top of what has been revealed by the Chief we have the following information.
It is why we hear there are 12 witnesses that agree with the hearsay account that was reported.
This is why Don Lemon has reported that Official sources have confirmed that that hearsay account is accurate.
So the likely hood that what has been revealed is false by the Chief is just absurd. And opposing it is illogical.
"The law is reason, free from passion."
I believe the report is being held" so that it can be re-written to fit the evidence and get a murderer free.
BTW I am not alone in this suspicion.
This is exactly what Holder and the Feds are looking at.