- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 122,663
- Reaction score
- 27,421
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Then why do you continue to claim that they dont use them appropriately? Again...the final decision is up to them...only they are the ones in a position to decide that terminal risk. But you continue to claim that they should *try harder.* Or arent using them 'enough.'
The point is....you dont know but dont like it.
I can't make this any more simple for you. A guy with a knife can be subdued with a tazer. Pulling a gun first isn't even trying to use non-lethal force. If a cop is alone... gun. 100%. IF there are more then the ability to use non-lethal options is obvious.
... and I stated that it is up to them only because the law says it is up to them. Non-lethal force should be attempted every time there is a possibility that it could work. You don't even want them to try. "Screw that guy, he has a knife and there are a lot of us? Let's waste the bastard!" :roll: