I have been asking a couple of questions from the beginning which no one seems able to answer.
AG Holder has ordered a third autopsy on the federal governments dime.
The problem as I see it is that any autopsy involves invasive surgical procedures. Incisions, removal of organs, exploration of wounds, stitching the body back up etc. It would seem that any follow up autopsy would have massive problems due to the changes made in the first one. So which one is more accurate? In addition if , as seems inevitible , conflicting information comes out of them which autopsy is to be trusted.
No doubt those supporting the cop may end up trusting the first one and argueing for it's credibility. Those wishing to blame him will trust the second one by Dr. Baden. Big government cult members will state only the one ordered by Holder is valid.
The only good news for the cop is that the second and third autopsies are inadmissable in criminals court. Clearly the one performed by Baden will be used in the civil law suit. But the fact that it makes him less than objective is ignored.