For example, if a fellow were to see a lady and think to myself "ah, there is an attractive, intelligent young lady. I think I shall buy her a drink and think of a funny line with which to begin conversation", well, at that point, he would be a flirt. At the point at which she turns down his approaches and so he decides he will violently take her anyway, he is not "flirting in a disorderly fashion". He is a rapist. He is no longer seeking to change the nature of a relationship through persuasion (as protesters are attempting to do), he is attempting to take what he wants by force, and using physical access gained through flirting to do so. She would be wrong to respond with violence to a flirt - I hope she responds with overwhelming violence to a would-be-rapist. Because the nature of the mans' actions have changed.