I do not need to provide anything to point that what he provided was not what was being spoken about.
I never said they were any part of a Declared Emergency.
So pay attention to what is being said. I mean damn, it was very clear, so clear that you truncated the portion which says exactly what they were. That is dishonesty on your part.
What was provided was the common and generally accept definition, "a regulation requiring people to remain indoors."
Do you not think things through?
If the police tell them to get inside and they instead sit there and try to argue, they have failed to disperse.
So prove they were allowed to be where they weren't.
The fact that they were arrested pretty much says they weren't.
So show otherwise.