• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat [W:613/629]

Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

IOW:If he gets convicted, he might end up in the slammer.

Which is OK with me.




"Don't do the crime if you can't do the time."
 
Last edited:
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

As far as gerrymandering....I figure they already have that down pretty good.
Texas Democrats may be a little rusty.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Yea, the outrage is over Perry's right to Veto, not the fact that this Liberal DA is still in office after a DUI and making a absolute spectacle of herself.

No, the outrage is the massive conflict of interest when a state governor interferes with someone investigating his office.

Imagine if a president could veto their own impeachment. How would that not seem ****ed up to you?
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

I think that we are getting a little side-tracked here. I don't believe that Gov. Perry was indicted for his use of the veto, but rather the manner in which it was exercised. The two counts are "Abuse of Official Capacity" and "Coercion of Public Servant". The state laws that apply to this matter are Texas Penal Code Section 39.02: Abuse of Official Capacity, and Section 36.03: Coercion of Public Servant or Voter.

I've pulled some applicable language from both:
From 36.03:
(a) A person commits an offense if by means of coercion he:
(1) influences or attempts to influence a public servant in a specific exercise of his official power or a specific performance of his official duty or influences or attempts to influence a public servant to violate the public servant's known legal duty;

However this may be rendered moot by subsection c:
(c) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(1) of this section that the person who influences or attempts to influence the public servant is a member of the governing body of a governmental entity, and that the action that influences or attempts to influence the public servant is an official action taken by the member of the governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "official action" includes deliberations by the governing body of a governmental entity.

And from 39.02:
(a) A public servant commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or defraud another, he intentionally or knowingly:
(1) violates a law relating to the public servant's office or employment; or
(2) misuses government property, services, personnel, or any other thing of value belonging to the government that has come into the public servant's custody or possession by virtue of the public servant's office or employment.

Food for thought...
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

He has the authority to not only Veto spending but to announce that veto.




And the court has the authority to lock him up in prison for quite a few years.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

No, the outrage is the massive conflict of interest when a state governor interferes with someone investigating his office.
And again. This isn't about any investigation of his office.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

No, the outrage is the massive conflict of interest when a state governor interferes with someone investigating his office.

Imagine if a president could veto their own impeachment. How would that not seem ****ed up to you?


They were investigating Rick Perry ?

For what exactly ?

Because the indictment came down AFTER the Travis County DA got busted for DUI.

If the issue was simply shutting down the DA who's responsible for investigating corrupt lawmakers ( like Andrew Cuomo did ) he would have veoted their spending long ago.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

And the court has the authority to lock him up in prison for quite a few years.


For exercising his Constitutional authority ?

For saying he was going to exercise his Constitutional authority BEFORE he did it ?

Really ?
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Perry never had a serious shot at the presidency anyway. This just eliminates the teeny tiny chance that he thought he had in the first place. Good riddance to this idiot.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

For exercising his Constitutional authority ?

For saying he was going to exercise his Constitutional authority BEFORE he did it ?





If he's convicted of the crimes that he has been indicted for it's very possible that he'll do some serious jail time.

He'd look good in a prison jump-suit with stripes on it. I'd like to see that picture.




"Don't do the crime if you can't do the time."
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

This case is idiosyncratic at least because it involves Texas laws. I don't think that we need to presume that the precedent will apply to other states.
But Ianal.

But, istm, the charge is that this is different from standard veto dramas and idiosyncratic in other ways .
If Perry is convicted it will be because there was something about this case which makes it different from standard issue veto actions.
At least that's my ignorant opinion.

If Perry is not convicted, then maybe this veto drama is different than standard veto dramas without being illegal or it could be the same as run of the mill veto dramas.
Won't be able to tell from that alone.

But if this affair has some characteristics or attributes which distinguish it from "regular" vetoes, then the applicability of the precedent should be limited by those same distinguishing characteristics. Again, Ianal.


:salt:

We shall see what we shall see. Interesting case though.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Blago from my state has an open bed in his cell out in Colorado.
Ryan before him just got out.
And don't think for one moment they actually got all the Illinois crooks either .
If he's convicted of the crimes that he has been indicted for it's very possible that he'll do some serious jail time.

He'd look good in a prison jump-suit with stripes on it. I'd like to see that picture.




"Don't do the crime if you can't do the time."
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Blago from my state has an open bed in his cell out in Colorado.
Ryan before him just got out.
And don't think for one moment they actually got all the Illinois crooks either
.




I totally support locking up all of the crooks. on the left and the right.

If the court convicts them, put them behind bars.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

No, the Goal post were moved long before I posted in this thread.

Perry's legal authority to Veto spending suddenly morphed into a grand conspiracy to shut down Political investigations.

Its a BS, and its the best the Liberals can do.

Perry's popular in Texas, and through his leadership our economy has grown and so has our surplus.

This is only going to piss off and motivate the majority of Conservative voters in a already Red State.

Actually, Perry is not as popular as you believe. He won the governorship with only 34% of the vote. The other choices for gov were Democrat Chris Bell, Independent Kinky Friedman, the Raging Granny, whose name I forget, and a couple others who got a few votes. I voted for Friedman, a fellow "Jewboy". LOL.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

They were investigating Rick Perry ? For what exactly ? Because the indictment came down AFTER the Travis County DA got busted for DUI. If the issue was simply shutting down the DA who's responsible for investigating corrupt lawmakers ( like Andrew Cuomo did ) he would have veoted their spending long ago.
The CPRIT. The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

The funding that Rick Perry vetoed was going to the Travis County DA's Public Integrity Unit, which at the time was going after Rick Perry's appointees on the CPRIT. It's a grant-awarding organization that was created in 2007 per a voter's proposition is supposed to be funding research on cancer, however it had been making grant requests to organizations (skipping scientific and business reviews) tied to politician contributors of Rick Perry, Greg Abbott and David Dewhurst.

http://www.dallasnews.com/investiga...funded-projects-of-perry-campaign-contributor
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Watching right-wingers lose their mind over this is hilarious. Suddenly everything is SO unfair. :lamo
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

The CPRIT. The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

The funding that Rick Perry vetoed was going to the Travis County DA's Public Integrity Unit, which at the time was going after Rick Perry's appointees on the CPRIT. It's a grant-awarding organization that was created in 2007 per a voter's proposition is supposed to be funding research on cancer, however it had been making grant requests to organizations (skipping scientific and business reviews) tied to politician contributors of Rick Perry, Greg Abbott and David Dewhurst.

http://www.dallasnews.com/investiga...funded-projects-of-perry-campaign-contributor
And?


You have no point.
Had she resigned that office would have had that funding and continued investigating.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Imagine if a president could veto their own impeachment. How would that not seem ****ed up to you?
You analogy may be a little stretched as an impeachment is more like a trial than an investigation and Congress isn't an investigative body.
Also, I think that the investigation is not into Perry but one of Perry's acquaintances.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/16/u...d-over-veto-of-funds-for-das-office.html?_r=0
At the time of Mr. Perry’s veto last year, prosecutors in the unit had been investigating a state agency called the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. The agency — one of Mr. Perry’s signature initiatives — came under scrutiny by state lawmakers after accusations of mismanagement and corruption; a former official there was indicted last year for his handling of an $11 million grant.​
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

Watching right-wingers lose their mind over this is hilarious. Suddenly everything is SO unfair. :lamo

WTF are you talking about?
It seems the Dems are salivating at the prospects of a Perry conviction.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

However this may be rendered moot by subsection c:
(c) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)(1) of this section that the person who influences or attempts to influence the public servant is a member of the governing body of a governmental entity, and that the action that influences or attempts to influence the public servant is an official action taken by the member of the governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the term "official action" includes deliberations by the governing body of a governmental entity.
The GJ indictment seems to refer to that:


"...the defendant and Rosemary Lehmberg were not members of the same governing body of a governmental entity..."
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

He cut funding to a group investigating him.

Can you imagine the conservative response if Obama cut funding to groups investigating Benghazi?

What were they investigating him for?
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

The CPRIT. The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas.

The funding that Rick Perry vetoed was going to the Travis County DA's Public Integrity Unit, which at the time was going after Rick Perry's appointees on the CPRIT. It's a grant-awarding organization that was created in 2007 per a voter's proposition is supposed to be funding research on cancer, however it had been making grant requests to organizations (skipping scientific and business reviews) tied to politician contributors of Rick Perry, Greg Abbott and David Dewhurst.

http://www.dallasnews.com/investiga...funded-projects-of-perry-campaign-contributor
And? You have no point. Had she resigned that office would have had that funding and continued investigating.
... and this is the third Rick Perry program that has been giving grants to Texas Republican Leadership. The other two are the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technology Fund.

Had she resigned, Rick Perry would have appointed her replacement. So you'd have a corruption investigation tied against Perry's administration being taken over by one of his direct appointees.

Either way Rick Perry was able to successfully hinder the corruption investigation. When the funding for the Public Integrity Unit was vetoed by Perry, Travis County stepped in and provided half of the original funding coming from the state.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

... and this is the third Rick Perry program that has been giving grants to Texas Republican Leadership. The other two are the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Emerging Technology Fund.

Had she resigned, Rick Perry would have appointed her replacement. So you'd have a corruption investigation tied against Perry's administration being taken over by one of his direct appointees.

Either way Rick Perry was able to successfully hinder the corruption investigation. When the funding for the Public Integrity Unit was vetoed by Perry, Travis County stepped in and provided half of the original funding coming from the state.
Gawd! :doh
And?
It has nothing to do with the indictment.
 
Re: Gov. Rick Perry indicted for abuse of power for carrying out threat to veto prose

I don't see how this can possibly fly. From the report it seems the only thing he did is say "I'm going to veto funding is you pass it" which, to the best of my knowledge, is perfectly legal and done pretty damned regularly across the nation as well as in DC.

It's fascinating that an ethics complaint was filed against a guy who followed the law while the bitch that got wasted, got busted driving drunk and abused her authority is, apparently, fine and dandy with the Democrats. I mean, I could see that in Massachusetts Democrats but I'm kind of surprised to see it in Texas.

Democrats? The Governor has been indicted on 2 felonies. What does that have to do with Democrats?
 
Back
Top Bottom