I do not like most American Republican officials.
I agree though that this case will go no where.
If it was a bill to limit interest rates charged by payday loan companies vetoed by a Govenor who owned such "businesses" then there may ne a case of some sort. If a Govenor was paid to veto a bill then there would be a case. Both for abuse of power.
That is not at all similar to this.
But I'm just a Canuck Komrade, what do I know.