• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Protests over Missouri teen's death turn violent[W:647,807]

Status
Not open for further replies.
By reporting news.. Also I dont think anyone here is going to go out and kill him.

It's a public message board and anyone can read it.

And I'll ask again. Because the "*NewsOne for Black America" felt compelled to share the name, why did you have to continue it, and why on here? Is there any reason right now, with the goings on in that town, that anyone on this board needs to know his name?
 
Sadly, I've seen enough riots in Southern California in my life time to see how they are encouraged, and what happens as a result. Remember, Democrat Congresswoman Maxine Waters chanted "No justice, no peace" as she encouraged people to attack whites and burn down the city.

It's all part of the plan. This one is probably tied to getting the press off the illegal alien invasion that has received too much scrutiny by citizens. Minorities abandoned in favor the illegals have been rightfully pissed by the Democrats moves, so this just shakes the table up a bit so they can get back to exploiting them in other ways.

Now there's a thought! They could pull the cops out and send the "refugees" in to handle things!
 
This is the new reality. Don't like something? Foment chaos.

New reality? Boston Tea party..Tarring and Feathering.. Fomenting chaos has been humanity's go-to since time enumerable
 
No one has been denied anything in this case and I'm not sure what relevance social media has to the quote of mine you quoted. :shrug:

i was trying to say that the recent protest movements like arab spring have used soical media such as twitter, youtube and facebook as a way to spread their message because these sources of media are free and easy to access. it also makes it difficult to establish a coherent narrative because information is spreading too fast to be properly verified.
 

He's already declared this Cop guilty, so the public release of his personal information and the harrasment of him and his family is completley justified.

I thought our justice system had evolved beyond rounding up a posse and declaring vigilante justice

But apparently not
 
I think in here, if TDS follows through with his threat to post the man's name, address, etc. It should be treated the same as threat against another poster.

In all fairness, that isn't TDS's doins.
 
New reality? Boston Tea party..Tarring and Feathering.. Fomenting chaos has been humanity's go-to since time enumerable


Vigalante justice is a bit dated dont you think ?
 
To be fair, the "journalists" taken into custody (not arrested) were from the washington post and the huffington post. Not journalists, opinion pushers.


The police are going bat crazy there.. arresting journalists, gassing the public and probably worse.
 
No one has been denied anything in this case and I'm not sure what relevance social media has to the quote of mine you quoted. :shrug:

That's not entirely true.

The citizens of Ferguson who don't want to be on the news and just want to live their lives in a sane and simple way have been denied the ability to do that by all the assholes who want "justice".
 
To be fair, the "journalists" taken into custody (not arrested) were from the washington post and the huffington post. Not journalists, opinion pushers.

This post is so stupid it needs a helmet.
 
Why on Earth did you post it here?
Because its relevant to the topic at hand.
From your link from the "NewsOne for Black America" site:

*Editor’s Note: The original AP report did not include the alleged officer’s name involved in Michael Brown’s killing. NewsOne added the above information.

Even the AP knows it's distasteful and wrong. And no, "news sites" are not reporting his name. In fact, legitimate news sites are NOT reporting a name, and now they are all reporting that the name you posted is not correct.

Brilliant.

Cool. I used the NewsOne site.
 


You have to keep in mind that, as a devout socialist, instigating, promoting and supporting civil unrest and divisiveness is part of the grand plan. He's just doing his job.
 
It's a public message board and anyone can read it.
Really? No way! I never knew that!


And I'll ask again. Because the "*NewsOne for Black America" felt compelled to share the name, why did you have to continue it, and why on here? Is there any reason right now, with the goings on in that town, that anyone on this board needs to know his name?

Because it news relevant to the topic.
 
More from anaonymous:
The online activist group Anonymous has threatened to reveal the identity and other personal information of the police officer they say is responsible for the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. However, they have called that effort (for now) after denials from St. Louis area police that they had the right person, and after Twitter suspended one of their accounts. No other media outlets have been able to verify whether their information is correct or not. Read below for the latest updates...

The latest:

1:21 p.m.: After switching to a secondary account (@TheAnonMessage), the group that named the alleged shooter says they won't be releasing any more information for the time being.

Anonymous Stops Releasing Information on Alleged Officer Who Shot Michael Brown - The Wire
 
Pure speculation. One fact we do know is that some kind of struggle ensued inside the patrol car. So that alone makes your hypothetical of the cop getting out and grabbing him wrong period.

Was he shot inside the car or outside running away? Or other?

Do we know that yet or is that all still speculation?
 
To be fair, the "journalists" taken into custody (not arrested) were from the washington post and the huffington post. Not journalists, opinion pushers.

Bull****. They were arrested, but not charged. The police were no better than the Gestapo in what they did. The whole episode is very well documented with witnesses. They enter the McDonalds, a journalist takes a picture of it.. he happens to be there using the free wifi and charging.. a police officer because arrogant, they start to leave and turn around and say that they are closing the McD. He was arrested for not packing his bag fast enough, and considering the attitude of the police in the area as reported by others.. then chances are that the journalist is right and the jackboot called police are at fault yet again.

Also Al Jazerra was tear gassed and their equipment stolen by the police! Thankfully it was caught on camera too.

No the police are totally out of control there. Sure there is looting but they are treating everyone as criminals and abusing their authority and it does not help that they are accused of shooting an unarmed youth. The Feds should have sent in impartial police at the start.
 
Good, they should be ashamed.

Honestly, the only reason why his name and address would be "relevent" is to perpetuate and promote vigalante " justice ".

yeah, apparently the NAACP lawyers have gone into court demanding they release the name of the officer. For what reason? The man's name will come out eventually. Why not let things settle down before DEMANDING this guy(and his family) be put in the crosshairs of an angry mob.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom