Let's ask some questions.
1) Why would he shoot an unarmed individual?
2) Can you prove that why?
3) Do you really believe that this cop would just gun him down rather than arresting him?
4) why would be not just arrest him? If he had cause to shoot him, he had cause to arrest him.
Keep in mind: I don't give a damn which way this goes. If this kid is a criminal and the cop killed him because the kid was getting aggressive and blah blah blah...good. If the cop shot the kid who was unarmed and the kid was doing nothing...he needs to be in jail. I have no bone in this fight.
So please answer me those questions. I'm curious what you feel.
The Crowd is not the sum of its parts.
Einstein, "science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
Moderator's Warning: Closed for review.