Read the article you posted. "
Then one of the officers noticed a bulge in Serna's waistband and asked if he had a gun. Serna said he did, and the police told him to put his hands on his head and took the gun. When the police learned that Serna had prior felony convictions, making him a "prohibited possessor," they arrested him and charged him with misconduct with weapons."
Easy probable cause, no illegal search since he answered the question, admitted to possession and they took the gun off of him, probably for their own safety, while doing the computer check, actual "seizure" didn't take place until they arrested him and took it as evidence. It would be illegal seizure only if they had taken it and did not return it after the background/computer check, if it didn't tell them he was a convicted felon in possession of a firearm. The charge should of been felon in possession, not misconduct with weapons. There is absolutely nothing wrong with what they did, except maybe not asking if he had a permit/CCA.
Be sure to work hard and get lots of overtime. People on welfare want more steaks and free upgrades to smart phones with unlimited data packages.
you can want it the other way if you want but theres nothing you can post to change anything for me. Theres ZERO logic or rational youll ever be able to post to justify bulge = probably cause, thats crap lol