• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

1,000-member secretive progressive journalist group uncovered

Progressives are:

NEW POLL: America Is Evenly Divided Between Progressives/Liberals And Conservatives/Libertarians | ThinkProgress

They were at the same level in 2009 so now the Progressives are a bigger part of the population.
I'll find a poll for 2014 later.
From your link. "Under this schematic, 34 percent of the country self-identifies as ‘conservative’, 29 percent as ‘moderate’, 15 percent as ‘liberal’, 16 percent as ‘progressive’, and 2 percent as ‘libertarian’".

You'll see that 34% are conservative and 16% are 'progressive.
 
Lol !

Most likely more than your'e willing to admit.

Sally Cohen's one of them.
Surprise !

She's such a incorrigible hack.

Wow, that is a huuuuuuuge allegation!!! So direct me to a link, I gotta read this! :popcorn2:
 
Correct, nor does this suggest otherwise.

"But...but...but...the media isn't in the tank for Obama! You're just mad becase he's so wonderful!"
 
"But...but...but...the media isn't in the tank for Obama! You're just mad becase he's so wonderful!"

This does not suggest the media is "in the tank" for anyone.
 
Hmmm, it seems we hear quite a lot about what the Koch's want and do here every day. Open email systems are not at discussion here. Funny though to hear the left try to defend K Street type groups now that the foo is ****ting on the other foot.

Ok. I'll take a list of their google group subscriptions and facebook "liked" pages.
 
"But...but...but...the media isn't in the tank for Obama! You're just mad becase he's so wonderful!"

"You're just jealous of rich people."
 
The supposed Weapons of Mass destruction " lie " was a left wing false narrative.

You got sucked into it apparently.

Your gullibility doesn't equate to Republican " lies "

Are you talking about the "chemical weapons" recently seized in Iraq?
 
Are you talking about the "chemical weapons" recently seized in Iraq?

You mean the ones that Assad used on his own people while the coward Obama was afraid to back up his own tough talk, and the so called inspection group won't even report what it is they found to the public?

mmmmmhhhhmmmmm....
 
You mean the ones that Assad used on his own people while the coward Obama was afraid to back up his own tough talk, and the so called inspection group won't even report what it is they found to the public?

mmmmmhhhhmmmmm....

Assad gassed his own people in Iraq? That's news to me.
 
Yay! More far left loons circle jerking in Journ-O-list 3.0!
We saw this movie already in 2007. 'member Ezra Klein's little circle jerk group where they discussed how to spin media news to benefit liberal candidates.
That it would all be created again in preparation for 2016? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you!

JournoList - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
You mean the ones that Assad used on his own people while the coward Obama was afraid to back up his own tough talk, and the so called inspection group won't even report what it is they found to the public?

mmmmmhhhhmmmmm....

So the weapons went to Syria, but when anybody talked about going after them, that was wrong?

I'm against going into Syria too, but I was against Iraq. At least be consistent - if the weapons were such a big problem that we needed to invade Iraq, then we should go after them in Syria. Though I suspect that the biggest difference for the right is whether the President is an R or a D....
 
Yay! More far left loons circle jerking in Journ-O-list 3.0!
We saw this movie already in 2007. 'member Ezra Klein's little circle jerk group where they discussed how to spin media news to benefit liberal candidates.
That it would all be created again in preparation for 2016? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you!

JournoList - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We can't have the press be free to have a partisan bent! That would be just like it's always been since...well since Jefferson and Hamilton did it back in the early days.

I know you guys like crying about "Oooh, everybody hates us, boo hoo, that's why we lost in 2012 (it has nothing to do with having a ****ty candidate)" but really....
 
We can't have the press be free to have a partisan bent! That would be just like it's always been since...well since Jefferson and Hamilton did it back in the early days.

I know you guys like crying about "Oooh, everybody hates us, boo hoo, that's why we lost in 2012 (it has nothing to do with having a ****ty candidate)" but really....

Obviously the only people crying are progressives who were outed. If we don't have a media that keeps their buddies in line we obviously cannot trust that media and what they say. Is it any wonder one of the only groups more hated than Congress in the US is the media? (BTW that was a rhetorical question.) My question is why don't these media ******s just come out of the closet and be honest - they're die hard progressives and will ignore unfavorable activies, or at least spin those activities when it's a Democrat... and will hammer and decry when it's a Republican. But honesty isn't the raison d'etra of these media circle jerk types who hide behind "the press". Waaaaa.... progressive loons were outed again like in 2007!!
 
Obviously the only people crying are progressives who were outed. If we don't have a media that keeps their buddies in line we obviously cannot trust that media and what they say. Is it any wonder one of the only groups more hated than Congress in the US is the media? (BTW that was a rhetorical question.) My question is why don't these media ******s just come out of the closet and be honest - they're die hard progressives and will ignore unfavorable activies, or at least spin those activities when it's a Democrat... and will hammer and decry when it's a Republican. But honesty isn't the raison d'etra of these media circle jerk types who hide behind "the press". Waaaaa.... progressive loons were outed again like in 2007!!

So your whole problem is that they're not "out of the closet?"

Yeah, I believe that....:lamo
 
So your whole problem is that they're not "out of the closet?"

Yeah, I believe that....:lamo

"Honesty.... is such a lonely word. Everyone is so untrue."
 
You mean the ones that Assad used on his own people while the coward Obama was afraid to back up his own tough talk, and the so called inspection group won't even report what it is they found to the public?

mmmmmhhhhmmmmm....

The rebels used the chemical weapons on civilians.

Obama's hands were tied on Syria, stop lying about this. Clinton was dispatched to the UN on three occasions to secure a resolution for use of force, all three times Russia and China said NO!!!!!

The UK parliament said no to military action in Syria.

Congress would not authorize the use of force in Syria.

70% of Americans were against military action in Syria.

I know you would have preferred Obama be the belligerent that Bush was.
 
Why does the left feel the need to hide their true beliefs? C'mon, shout it out, if it's so great.
You guys hate the Constitution, want that gone. Too restrictive on what government can do. Taxes are never high enough, you want government to take more of what we make. You never, ever want to cut government, because they are not yet into our lives enough yet. Tell me, when will that be?

When will you say, "Hey, government has grown big enough, and has enough control of our lives. Government has taken enough freedoms from us. Let's put a stop to it."

And really, why hide behind names like "progressive" or "liberal"? I have more respect for those on here that come right out and call themselves Communists than the people that are, but won't say it.
 
The issue is the idea of a conspiracy of journalists conspiring with educators to push a common message, purposefully without informing consumers that this is what they are all doing together. Is this group evidence of such a conspiracy? I dont know.
 
Are you talking about the "chemical weapons" recently seized in Iraq?


No, I'm talking about the whole " Bush lied people died " manufactured false narrative.
 
Back
Top Bottom