- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Even Lincoln never referred to them as traitors.
Please stop whining
Even Lincoln never referred to them as traitors.
Please stop whining
Please stop breathing.
Dead and burried? No. But a lazy response to criticism? You bet.You're claim fits Sharpton better than Jackson, but it's important to note we all don't have the same experiences. We used to say when I was younger to walk in another person's shoes before you criticize too much. For those who have benefited the most to say to those who have benefited the least to quite whining and playing victim is rather arrogant no matter who does it. While I'm responding to you, I mean this across the board. I can't imagine that anyone really believes all racism is dead and buried.
Yep, he's such a dictator. I mean right this very moment you are being arrested for what you just posted about him....oh wait you aren't. Because he isn't a dictator or king. While I agree his actions are horrible, they aren't anything unlike the power other presidents have used like YOU have voted for in the past.
Calling him a dictator or king is just pathetic rhetoric from people that don't like what he was doing, however, during past presidents time they supported those same executive "dicatorship" actions.
Moderator's Warning: |
Enough of the trolling and personal attacks, or more infractions will be levied. |
Yep, he's such a dictator. I mean right this very moment you are being arrested for what you just posted about him....oh wait you aren't. Because he isn't a dictator or king. While I agree his actions are horrible, they aren't anything unlike the power other presidents have used like YOU have voted for in the past.
It was George Bush that first saw the constitution as an impediment, and because you guys let him get away with it then, we see more of it now!
Speaking of the constitution and a court ruling against Him, Bush had this to say.
"I strongly disagree with that document. Strongly disagree," President Bush said. The president called the Constitution, "out of touch with 21st century terror."
"Now look, here's the Constitution, it was written 200 years ago. They didn't have this kind of a threat. They didn't have to be adaptive. They made all these restricting rules, and there's no way to change it. It is out of place in this century, in this fight. Al-queda doesn't care about it, so we can't either."
As if to underscore Bush's point, Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga) added, "If the appeal continues and this decision's upheld, then we'll have to set policy that does comply with the Constitution. This takes away a vital tool in our war on terror. If we cannot sink to the level of Stalin and Hussein, how can we fight back?"
The White House's argument in support of the program is that Mr Bush's role as commander-in-chief of US forces gave him, "the inherent power to violate not only the laws of the Congress but the first and fourth amendments of the constitution", according to White House Spokesman Tony Snow.
UnNews:Bush Calls U.S. Constitution "Naive" - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
In fact, through the IRS and the DOJ, it seems he has tried to silence the opposition.
It was hyperbole for effect. But if he could fully have his way.......
Who cares if he's the worst president in history. For this time in history when we need a strong effective leader, he's horrible. Absolutely.
It seems, especially after your Limbaugh comments, that have no understanding of parody.
He hasn't .....yet.I'm sorry do you care to show where Obama has been convicted of using the IRS or DOJ to silence the opposition or is this another one of your rhight-wing rants without proof.
The extent to which a patronizer will go to defend the presidents diminishing of the constitution. But then its not yours, why would you respect it.
I'm sorry do you care to show where Obama has been convicted of using the IRS or DOJ to silence the opposition or is this another one of your rhight-wing rants without proof.
That sort of blind loyalty to a politician can often have negative consequences.
And Blind loyalty to the extremist right wing has its negative consequences as well... namely everything you've ever posted.
You didn't understand the parody, did you?
None of what you said addressed what I said in my quote. Yeah, you should take your own advice and lie down.
Economy, honesty, divisiveness, partisanship, USA stature among allies and enemies, Constitutionalist ...
It might be easier if you just list his achievements.
You make point.Nobel Peace Prize for ? :shrug:
You make point.
It appears the Nobel Prize Committee perceived Obama a lot more accurately than many of our own citizens.
They said ... "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples" ... but they were thinking "for his willingness to subordinate his own Country and redistribute its abundance across the Globe until equality is acheived"
Greetings, bubba! :2wave:
It looks like you have hit the nail squarely on the head again! :thumbs:
Greetings, bubba! :2wave:
It looks like you have hit the nail squarely on the head again! :thumbs: