destroying those defective hard drives to prevent access to privileged information does not seem unreasonable if that was the agency policy when the hard drive was destructed. determining whether that was actually the IRS policy/practice at that time would seem to be a reasonable question to ask and ensure is answered. maybe issa will actually do something, and ask that question
and isn't the interest primarily in lerner's communication to white house staff
why can the white house servers not be queried to identify/supply the sought after emails initiated by and responded to learner?
another question issa should insist is answered
why does he not make such inquiries? is he afraid the answers will end the fabricated 'scandal' and prevent him from getting and more headline coverage?