• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy[W:8]

Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

I've already addressed where you said this before -- if she doesn't want help, she's not going to get it. There are many places she could have gotten help in Knoxville if she wanted it, but clearly she did not want help. You cannot help an addict until they are ready to be helped.

That's fine and dandy but your missing the bigger picture and quickly dismissing it because it doesn't fully agree with you (debate?)

Discussing the arrest as you requested in the OP:


The first arrest applying a new Tennessee law that charges a woman with assault for taking illegal drugs while pregnant has sparked backlash from civil rights groups.

Mallory Loyola, 26, was arrested Tuesday, two days after giving birth to a baby girl, because she and her newborn tested positive for methamphetamine, Monroe County Sheriff Bill Bivens said.

“A woman may be prosecuted for assault for the illegal use of a narcotic drug while pregnant, if her child is born addicted to or harmed by the narcotic drug,” reads a law passed on July 1.

“Addiction is a very complex issue, and we need to make sure we are doing all that we can to care for our fellow Tennesseans,” said Tennessee Department of Mental Health Commissioner E. Douglas Varney.

But women’s rights and civil rights groups don’t think the law effectively cares for women who are addicted to drugs, and they said Loyola’s case proves their argument.

“The state’s newly expanded fetal assault law is designed to humiliate and punish, not treat or protect,” said a statement from the group, National Advocates for Pregnant Women.

In this specific case, the group said, the law doesn't even apply. The law stipulates that a new mother can be charged if she was using narcotics while pregnant, and Loyola was not, it said. Methamphetamine is a stimulant, not a narcotic, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

National Advocates for Pregnant Women said as a result of Loyola’s arrest, the group has already received calls from pregnant women “paralyzed with fear” from seeking prenatal care because they don’t want to risk getting arrested.

In a letter to Tennessee Gov. Bill Haslam, urging him to veto the law, The ACLU pointed out that the American Academy of Pediatrics has founded, “punitive measures taken toward pregnant women, such as criminal prosecution and incarceration, have no proven benefits for infant health.”

“By focusing on punishing women rather than promoting healthy pregnancies, the state is only deterring women struggling with alcohol or drug dependency from seeking the pre-natal care they need,” said Thomas H. Castelli, legal director of the Tennessee ACLU in response to Loyola’s arrest.

Bivens said he thinks the law will have the opposite effect, and motivate addicted mothers-to-be to seek care.

"I think people need to be accountable for their actions, especially when you have another human being about to be born into this world," Bivens said.

More than 900 infants experienced drug withdrawal in Tennessee in 2013, according to the state's Department of Health. Bivens said that number "saddens" him and he hopes the new law "is for the betterment of the child."

Loyola is being held at the Monroe County Jail on $2,000 bond. Bivens said he does not know if she's been offered treatment, or where the baby is being cared for.
First published July 14 2014, 11:03 AM

Elisha Fieldstadt

... Expand Bio

So, as others point out, what personal actively will be criminalized next? Where is the consent for search and seizure? Most importantly, now that she's incarcerated is she getting help? If she wants help now and not offered the help is that right. Or does your insistence of people wanting to get help only apply to people who have not gotten caught.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

I somewhat agree with you, that women (everyone, really) need help with addiction. Thing is, there are places out there that help. You have to want help, though, to get it. There are scores of addiction counselors in Knoxville, and she could have gotten help there, if she wanted it. But you can't force someone to get help, even if they are pregnant. You can only threaten them with incarceration if they continue down the path they are on. She chose to go down the path she was on, and now she is paying the penalty for it, and it's possible that the baby is as well.

Do you know something about Knoxville, or are you just assuming that because it's a decent sized city that there are 'scores of counselors' there, and that they would see this woman? The reason I'm asking is I do some work for a Knoxville charity that helps male addicts, mostly homeless, and all of them poor, and there are very FEW options for them. We have a long waiting list, and the vast majority of rehab places in town just aren't realistic options for people without good insurance that will cover the cost, or with an extra 5-10k laying around, which isn't the case with most meth addicts from Madisonville, which is very poor and very rural. So the more realistic options were probably AA or NA meetings.

I actually agree with the tough love sentiment to a large extent. If I thought hanging a crime over her head would help protect the child, that's fine. It's a misdemeanor, and I assume the Drug Courts in many counties, and all the larger counties, would preside over most of the cases, and she'd be offered a chance at complying with a court supervised treatment program before spending any time in jail. I couldn't find that Monroe County has a drug court, so who knows if that's an option or not where she lives.

My problem is the state will fund a jail cell no matter what, but funding for treatment is spotty at best. We get occasional grants, and they last a year or two, but it's not enough to sustain a PROGRAM (we often get grants for treating mental illness) much less facilities for the poor. They can't get up and running based on current funding levels with any confidence that funding will exist even one year in the future, so it's tough for the programs to survive and most do not. Other facilities will take on poor customers when state/local money is available, but there are very few slots open at them because they have to keep the business model focused on patients with insurance or money.

If I was confident that a pregnant woman could get treatment during pregnancy, and just decided she's rather smoke meth, I have much fewer concerns about the assault charge, but I'm not, and especially in counties like Monroe county. And of course Tennessee didn't expand Medicaid which might provide these women with decent options before she got pregnant. Medicaid will generally provide care AFTER she's already pregnant. Anyway, all this is a long way to say that the problem isn't so much with the concept as the execution and in Tennessee I can promise the execution will be far short of ideal for these women.
 
My thoughts are, if she hadn't been using illegal drugs to start with, she wouldn't have been arrested.

And can we talk about the arrest, and not turn this into a pro-life/pro-choice argument?

This is where I think charges like this show the hypocrisy of Pro-Choice. If a woman has the right to do to her body what she wants to, then this charge should be a posession charge and not an assault charge.

I know you didn't want this to happen with mentioning pro-choice, but it goes hand in hand with this situation.

If a baby can be aborted, then this charge should only be a possession charge. That would at least be consistant.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

So, as others point out, what personal actively will be criminalized next? Where is the consent for search and seizure? Most importantly, now that she's incarcerated is she getting help? If she wants help now and not offered the help is that right. Or does your insistence of people wanting to get help only apply to people who have not gotten caught.

Yeah, that's the Sheriff who arrested her answering that he's not sure if she's been offered treatment. He's not in the business of caring for addicts, but the problem is the two aren't linked in any way. That's exactly my problem with the 'charge them with crime and if there is treatment available, fine, if not then well that's too bad' approach.
 
Should be charged with attempted manslaughter.

Well that makes sense. I suppose you'll charge all the wealthy women who have a glass of wine while pregnant with attempted manslaughter too. And we'll fill up the jails with pregnant women, and then have a few thousand extra kids in foster care while they wait on mom to serve out her 15 year sentence. Good plan. Don't see any problem with that at all....
 
Well that makes sense. I suppose you'll charge all the wealthy women who have a glass of wine while pregnant with attempted manslaughter too. And we'll fill up the jails with pregnant women, and then have a few thousand extra kids in foster care while they wait on mom to serve out her 15 year sentence. Good plan. Don't see any problem with that at all....

Glass of wine, hits of meth. Yea, same thing. Please man, get real. Quit with the extremes.
 
She should also be sterilized. But we don't do that here under any circumstances. We just continue to ruin our gene pool. Third world crap hole here we come.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

Yeah, that's the Sheriff who arrested her answering that he's not sure if she's been offered treatment. He's not in the business of caring for addicts, but the problem is the two aren't linked in any way. That's exactly my problem with the 'charge them with crime and if there is treatment available, fine, if not then well that's too bad' approach.

:shrug: I don't know. I have no response to this. My only addiction in this life has been cigarettes, so I can't begin to understand addiction to meth or anything else. I will say that I can't understand why, when they are straight, why they can't make the conscious decision to try to get help for the baby's sake. If they don't want to get help for themselves, fine, but once they get pregnant, there's more to think about. I quit smoking when I got pregnant. I didn't want to. It was just a matter of not being selfish, and putting my own wants aside for what was better for the baby.

Again - I've never been an addict to anything other than cigarettes, so I won't claim to know if the addiction is just as strong. I do know that she would not be the first addict to get help, because she loved her baby enough to try to get help. She just has to want to, and obviously this woman didn't want to.

I could almost guarantee that, if she walked into an ER and said, "I'm pregnant and addicted to meth. Can you help me?" They would help her. If not, they'd set themselves up for liability, as well as bad publicity.
 
Glass of wine, hits of meth. Yea, same thing. Please man, get real. Quit with the extremes.

If you want to make a serious proposal, I'll treat it seriously. In the meantime, the point was alcohol abuse during pregnancy is incredibly harmful to the kids, same as abuse of other drugs. Occasional use of any drugs including alcohol is less harmful, but the only safe level is zero or nearly zero. So I'm not sure what use you have in mind that rises to the level of attempted manslaughter, but you certainly can't draw a line with alcohol on one side and meth on the other. And the story doesn't indicate how often the person used meth. It's a safe bet that it was regular use, perhaps daily or more, but there is no evidence to that effect.

Besides, do you think a charge of attempted manslaughter motivates women to get help? Perhaps, but if the help isn't available, then what? Fill up the jails with drug abusers who get pregnant?
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

:shrug: I don't know. I have no response to this. My only addiction in this life has been cigarettes, so I can't begin to understand addiction to meth or anything else. I will say that I can't understand why, when they are straight, why they can't make the conscious decision to try to get help for the baby's sake. If they don't want to get help for themselves, fine, but once they get pregnant, there's more to think about. I quit smoking when I got pregnant. I didn't want to. It was just a matter of not being selfish, and putting my own wants aside for what was better for the baby.

I'll just say what should be and what is are different. Yes, a mother SHOULD be able to quit meth for nine months. But the fact is there are treatment facilities out there doing business for a reason, and that reason is the vast majority of addicts will fail with the "cold turkey, I can do this myself" approach. They should not need a facility, because if they're there, you can bet their life was in a tailspin and the loss of family, wife, kids, job, health, everything they hold dear would provide a sane person with the motivation to quit and stay clean and sober, but in reality IT IS NOT, and it's because an addict is not sane while in active addiction.

Again - I've never been an addict to anything other than cigarettes, so I won't claim to know if the addiction is just as strong. I do know that she would not be the first addict to get help, because she loved her baby enough to try to get help. She just has to want to, and obviously this woman didn't want to.

Obviously? Where is that in the record. My whole point on the earlier post was to point out that treatment options are few or just do not exist in reality for poor people. If you know otherwise in Knoxville or Madisonville, which facilities could she check herself into and which counselors take on the poor?

I could almost guarantee that, if she walked into an ER and said, "I'm pregnant and addicted to meth. Can you help me?" They would help her. If not, they'd set themselves up for liability, as well as bad publicity.

Goodness, an ER doesn't treat addicts. What it does do is temporarily stabilize them. Maybe she would spend a day or two in the hospital to detox and get her vitals into the normal range, and then they discharge them. I know this because our guys often have to spend a night or so in ER when they're coming off alcohol, in particular, because detox from alcohol is potentially fatal. The question is what happens after that. If you don't realize this, you really should read up a bit on addiction.

Like I said, I'm not opposed to the concept. Knox county has a Drug Court where non-violent addicts are given the option of treatment or processing through the normal system. THAT is a decent approach, assuming the court/state funds treatment, which they normally do, at least in my area.

What I have a problem with is hanging criminal charges over someone's head and then not providing for the help IF someone should need it, and a meth addict needs help.
 
If you want to make a serious proposal, I'll treat it seriously. In the meantime, the point was alcohol abuse during pregnancy is incredibly harmful to the kids, same as abuse of other drugs. Occasional use of any drugs including alcohol is less harmful, but the only safe level is zero or nearly zero. So I'm not sure what use you have in mind that rises to the level of attempted manslaughter, but you certainly can't draw a line with alcohol on one side and meth on the other. And the story doesn't indicate how often the person used meth. It's a safe bet that it was regular use, perhaps daily or more, but there is no evidence to that effect.

Besides, do you think a charge of attempted manslaughter motivates women to get help? Perhaps, but if the help isn't available, then what? Fill up the jails with drug abusers who get pregnant?
You are equating meth abuse to drinking a glass of wine, and you want me to be serious with you. Please.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

As I have already said once, I don't claim to understand addiction to meth, because I have never been addicted to meth. I never claimed to know about addiction - again, as I have already said once.

As far as the ER goes, I know that they have to get her stable, and again - I would almost guarantee that if she walked in, and said, "I'm pregnant and addicted to meth. Please help me." I guarantee you they would help her. Maybe, seeing as how you are an addiction counselor, you could check into this, because, being from Knoxville, as you say you are, that would be beneficial information for your skill set.


I am not from Knoxville, but did a quick Google search for "low income Knoxville drug addiction" and came up with a website called Free Addiction Centers. It gave me 4 different places in Knoxville that can help addicts who are considered low income. Now, again - I'm not from Knoxville, but that took 4 seconds to do. Waiting list? Yeah, who knows. They might have a waiting list. But again, I would almost guarantee that in the instance of a pregnant addict, they'd find a bed for her. But she has to want that bed, and you, as an addiction counselor, should know this better than anyone. If she doesn't help, she's not going to try to get it.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

I've heard a lot of arguments such as "this will deter them from getting help".They offer FREE rehab for moms who can't afford it in my state! They are not thinking clearly to even consider the ramifications for themselves, much less babies. Something needs to give. I never understood why if a mom gave her child a hit of a drug, that mom would be arrested and the child would be removed. It's no different. As a matter of fact it's worse in the developing brain when they're in utero.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

Just one more point - a pregnant addict poses a health crisis for the child, so the purpose of any policy choice is to get that woman the help she needs to quit, at least during the pregnancy. Even better would be to provide help to get off drugs BEFORE she gets pregnant.

But step one of that working as planned is making choices available to people who almost by definition have no money or support system to pay for that help. If she comes into a clinic for a routine OB appointment and the staff detects drugs in her system, they need to be able to say, "Here's where you can go...." If that someplace is an NA meeting in Knoxville, an hour drive each way, that's a near certain failure waiting to happen based on the evidence. So we might as well proceed on to step two, treat it as a criminal justice problem and involuntarily jail the mother at least until she gives birth.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

Just one more point - a pregnant addict poses a health crisis for the child, so the purpose of any policy choice is to get that woman the help she needs to quit, at least during the pregnancy. Even better would be to provide help to get off drugs BEFORE she gets pregnant.

But step one of that working as planned is making choices available to people who almost by definition have no money or support system to pay for that help. If she comes into a clinic for a routine OB appointment and the staff detects drugs in her system, they need to be able to say, "Here's where you can go...." If that someplace is an NA meeting in Knoxville, an hour drive each way, that's a near certain failure waiting to happen based on the evidence. So we might as well proceed on to step two, treat it as a criminal justice problem and involuntarily jail the mother at least until she gives birth.

I thought you said you were an addiction counselor. Are you saying that an NA meeting is going to be as good as a detox? If someone is an addict, going to an NA meeting isn't going to do jack **** until they get clean.

And I don't claim to know much about Madisonville, but I'm sure that there are places there that will help - even if it means a ride to Knoxville. Ministers? Addiction counselors? Friends? Family? Somebody would give her a ride to Knoxville. Somebody. I know Tennessee. It's a great state, and not nearly that heartless.
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

As I have already said once, I don't claim to understand addiction to meth, because I have never been addicted to meth. I never claimed to know about addiction - again, as I have already said once.

As far as the ER goes, I know that they have to get her stable, and again - I would almost guarantee that if she walked in, and said, "I'm pregnant and addicted to meth. Please help me." I guarantee you they would help her. Maybe, seeing as how you are an addiction counselor, you could check into this, because, being from Knoxville, as you say you are, that would be beneficial information for your skill set.

For the record, I'm not a counselor, just a board member.

No need to check into what services the ER offers addicts. They are these - DETOX AND STABILIZE THE PATIENT. The end. That's not a guess - we send guys to the ER all the time when their BP spikes and they're in danger of DYING, and then they come back to us the next day or two days later with some drugs to ease the transition. That's it. ER is now done with them.

And there are few if any drug treatment facilities in hospitals any longer - those functions are provided by....drug treatment facilities that cost perhaps 10k for a month or two of intensive outpatient care, and double or triple that for inpatient care, depending on the facility. The ER doc might refer her to a place like ours, which now has a waiting list of several hundred because we take on people who are dead broke, often homeless. But there aren't 'scores' of facilities like ours. A couple in Knoxville, all of the legitimate ones full all of the time, although you can find a flop house that provides no actual services, just collects money to temporarily provide a bed and to send them to AA meetings for 'treatment.'

I am not from Knoxville, but did a quick Google search for "low income Knoxville drug addiction" and came up with a website called Free Addiction Centers. It gave me 4 different places in Knoxville that can help addicts who are considered low income. Now, again - I'm not from Knoxville, but that took 4 seconds to do. Waiting list? Yeah, who knows. They might have a waiting list. But again, I would almost guarantee that in the instance of a pregnant addict, they'd find a bed for her. But she has to want that bed, and you, as an addiction counselor, should know this better than anyone. If she doesn't help, she's not going to try to get it.

I won't go through the list, but the only one on there that is typically available to poor people is Great Starts and they have a capacity of 24.

Here's the thing - I don't think we even disagree. I'm just pointing out the practical, on the ground realities of getting drug treatment when you're poor, and on the ground, in the real world, it's incredibly difficult and often functionally impossible because the services available are VERY limited. I know how drug treatment money flows from the state and it's OK one year, zero the next. If the 'charge them with a crime' approach was paired with a long term commitment to fund treatment, I'd be agnostic about that. We'd have to see how it works, but on the front end I'm OK with a big stick of charging them with a crime to get mothers into treatment. My problem all along is that I KNOW there are few options for that woman. Probably none in her county except for AA and perhaps NA meetings, and that is typical for Tennessee.
 
I havent figured out why this woman is up on charges.....because thousands of drug addicts do drugs during pregnancy and give birth every day.

Why is she the exception? (Not that I havent heard of this type of action before but it 'seems' rare).
 
Re: New Mother Charged with Assault for using Meth during Pregnancy

I thought you said you were an addiction counselor. Are you saying that an NA meeting is going to be as good as a detox? If someone is an addict, going to an NA meeting isn't going to do jack **** until they get clean.

You just misread my comment. I said if the only option was NA meetings, that was nearly certain to FAIL.

And I don't claim to know much about Madisonville, but I'm sure that there are places there that will help - even if it means a ride to Knoxville. Ministers? Addiction counselors? Friends? Family? Somebody would give her a ride to Knoxville. Somebody. I know Tennessee. It's a great state, and not nearly that heartless.

I'm telling you I live here, am active in this area through being a BOARD member for 8 years for the kind of place you think exists everywhere, and I'm telling you that you're overstating the ease with which poor people can access treatment. It's very difficult, often functionally impossible, to find the kind of treatment those women need, even at current levels of demand. If the 'charge them with a crime' approach succeeds, we should HOPEFULLY see many, many more women seeking help and if they do an already overloaded system is just made worse because funding hasn't increased to deal with that eventuality.
 
Last edited:
Clearly a glass of wine and a hit of meth are so widely different that the line is surely in there somewhere.

I don't think the evidence supports that. They're both potentially very dangerous, and the danger escalates with frequency of use.
 
Clearly a glass of wine and a hit of meth are so widely different that the line is surely in there somewhere.

I dont know much about meth but a GLASS of wine and a HIT of meth may be comparable.

We are talking about abuse, not a glass or a hit.
 
I dont know much about meth but a GLASS of wine and a HIT of meth may be comparable.

We are talking about abuse, not a glass or a hit.

Show me some science on that. People used to put wiskey in the mouths of teething babies. I don't recall a medicinal use for meth.
 
I don't think the evidence supports that. They're both potentially very dangerous, and the danger escalates with frequency of use.
What evidence? She is a meth head worthless scumbag. The other person said "glass of wine". One is legal, one is not.
 
Back
Top Bottom