• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Zimbabwe: Mugabe Tells All White Farmers they Must Give Up Their Land and 'Go'

And ?

Who was actualy behind arming the Mujahideen ? The left says Reagan but non revisionist history says "Charlie Wilson's War."

You know who Rep. Charlie Wilson (D-patriotic liberal) One of the real liberals who didn't come under the GOP tent after the radical left came under the Democrat tent during the ealy 1970's and hid behind the liberal label until they dirtied it and then hijacked the progressive label.

Charlie Wilson's War: How one man changed history

>" In the early summer of 1980, the Texas Congressman Charlie Wilson walked off the floor of the House of Representatives into the Speaker's Lobby. A Teletype at one end spewed out stories from AP, UPI and Reuters. Wilson was a news junkie, and he reached down and began reading a story datelined from Kabul.

The article described hundreds of thousands of refugees fleeing Afghanistan as Soviet helicopter gunships levelled villages, slaughtered livestock, and killed anyone who harboured guerrillas resisting the occupation. What caught Wilson's attention, however, was the reporter's conclusion that the Afghan warriors were refusing to quit. The article described how they were murdering Russians in the dead of night with knives and pistols, hitting them over the head with shovels and stones. Against all odds, there was a growing rebellion underway against the Red Army.

It would have been a sobering insight for the Communist rulers if they could have followed what happened in the few minutes after Wilson finished reading the Associated Press dispatch. The mysterious force in the US government that was destined to hound the Red Army with a seemingly limitless flood of ever more lethal weapons was about to be activated.

No one, however, was paying attention, not even in the American government, when Wilson picked up a phone and called the Appropriations Committee staffer who dealt with "black appropriations", the CIA funds..."<

continue -> Charlie Wilson's War: How one man changed history - Features - Films - The Independent

Had we not supported the Afghans at that time the Russians would have suppressed the rebellion.

The only thing that made any difference was the extreme economic shift of the War's soviet cost as Helicopters were being downed by relatively cheap Stingers.
 
One of our 'progressives' favorite dictators, Robert Mugabe, has declared that all White farmers must give up their land and go:

BBC News - Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe tells white farmers 'to go'

One would think he would have learned his lesson since he drove off most of the White farmers years ago. That little incident plunged Zimbabwe into a country that could not feed itself whereas the country had been the 'breadbasket' of Southern Africa for years with productive White farms. Do you think the world community and/or the UN should step in and prevent this ethnic cleansing?:shock::shock:

someone should have terminated that asshole's presidency with "extreme prejudice" years ago

That turd actually made Ian Smith's regime look beneficent
 
Had we not supported the Afghans at that time the Russians would have suppressed the rebellion.

The only thing that made any difference was the extreme economic shift of the War's soviet cost as Helicopters were being downed by relatively cheap Stingers.

The Soviets (communist) war in Afghanistan was just one battle of the Cold War. Just like the communist wars against Rohdesia and South Africa, both were battles of the Cold War.

America and it's allies didn't win every battle during the Cold War, but in the end game we won, you lost. :2usflag:
 
The Soviets (communist) war in Afghanistan was just one battle of the Cold War. Just like the communist wars against Rohdesia and South Africa, both were battles of the Cold War.

America and it's allies didn't win every battle during the Cold War, but in the end game we won, you lost. :2usflag:

o_O

Soviets weren't socialists nor Orthodox Marxists.

They were Leninists and Stalinists.

Socialism, in the main, calls for Participatory Democracy.

Who ever said I supported the Soviet Union?
 
Yessah.

Hey, an eye for an eye.

leaves everyone blind-especially the blacks who have seen their country turn into a bankrupt cesspool by driving away educated and industrious whites

Idi Amin did the same thing-he drove out Indian merchants

they did ok moving other places like the USA.

the blacks not so good
 
leaves everyone blind-especially the blacks who have seen their country turn into a bankrupt cesspool by driving away educated and industrious whites

Idi Amin did the same thing-he drove out Indian merchants

they did ok moving other places like the USA.

the blacks not so good

That's the point.

They should learn to stand on their own two feet. Depending on the whites hasn't boded too well for their societies.
 
o_O

Soviets weren't socialists nor Orthodox Marxists.

They were Leninists and Stalinists.

Socialism, in the main, calls for Participatory Democracy.

Who ever said I supported the Soviet Union?

orthodox marxists, leninists or stalinists-all slightly different strains of the same virus

the faster a vaccine is found, the better
 
That's the point.

They should learn to stand on their own two feet. Depending on the whites hasn't boded too well for their societies.

the whites should return with skilled killers and wipe out Mugabe and his thugs
 
orthodox marxists, leninists or stalinists-all slightly different strains of the same virus

the faster a vaccine is found, the better

Ignorance.

Just flat out Ignorance.
 
LOL, I love communists. Oh to be a kid again and believe in such fairy tales!

You just said all Far right wingers only diverge on small points of consideration.

Oh to be a grown man and have such an underdeveloped knowledge of the world!
 
Yes apparently that's your solution.

you don't read very well-I said nothing about killing blacks but merely Mugabe and his thugs
 
you don't read very well-I said nothing about killing blacks but merely Mugabe and his thugs

And you wanted "the whites" to do it.
 
o_O

Soviets weren't socialists nor Orthodox Marxists.

They were Leninists and Stalinists.

Socialism, in the main, calls for Participatory Democracy.

Who ever said I supported the Soviet Union?

Marxism, Leninism, Maoism, Nazism, good old communism are all just different forms of socialism.
 
And you wanted "the whites" to do it.

duh because they are the ones' being targeted for expatriation by the racist mugabe

you probably would claim I was racist if I thought the Jews should have killed Hitler and his cohorts!
 
Marxism, Leninism, Maoism, Nazism, good old communism are all just different forms of socialism.

While National Socialism is indeed an extremely impressive relatively "early" interpretation of Socialism it is tainted by Tolitarian acts.

Marxism

"Marxism–Leninism is a political ideology combining Marxism (the scientific socialist concepts theorised by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels) and Leninism (Vladimir Lenin's theoretical expansions of Marxism which include anti-imperialism, democratic centralism, and Vanguardist party-building principles).[1] Marxism–Leninism was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and of the Communist International (1919–43), making it the guiding ideology of the world communist movement. As such, it is the most prominent ideology associated with communism."

To be fair, I cannot discuss Maoism because I am not versed in it enough. But from what I read it is along the lines of non-Orthodox Marxist thinking, i.e. more similar to Bolshevik thought than Menshevik thought.

Not to say Menshivism was an entirely correct interpretation either, but it was far closer than Bolshevism and what was spawned of it.
 
Marxism

QUOTE]

Sorry, I don't recognise Wikipedia being a crediable source when the topic is political. You're not dealing with someone who believes if it's on the internet it must be true. I'm older than that.

:attn1:

WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY

>" Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia; that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information..."<
Wikipedia:General disclaimer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USE WIKIPEDIA AT YOUR OWN RISK

PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ANY INFORMATION YOU MAY FIND IN WIKIPEDIA MAY BE INACCURATE, MISLEADING, DANGEROUS, ADDICTIVE, UNETHICAL OR ILLEGAL.

Wikipedia:Risk disclaimer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Reliability of Wikipedia

Expert opinionLibrarians' viewsIn a 2004 interview with The Guardian, self-described information specialist and Internet consultant[49] Philip Bradley said that he would not use Wikipedia and was "not aware of a single librarian who would. The main problem is the lack of authority. With printed publications, the publishers have to ensure that their data are reliable, as their livelihood depends on it. But with something like this, all that goes out the window

Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
What a bunch of ungrateful niggers! What on Earth did the good white man do to them other than abuse, enslave, and slaughter their people for a century? Seriously, they should quit their whining.
 
Back
Top Bottom