- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 133,429
- Reaction score
- 43,228
- Location
- Miami
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
"....the Great Wall failed to stop enemies, including in 1644
Argument from absolute. Figures.
"....the Great Wall failed to stop enemies, including in 1644
:lamoArgument from absolute. Figures.
:lamo
Isnt that the job of a defensive wall? To stop enemies?
:lamo
Isnt that the job of a defensive wall? To stop enemies?
As I noted, you argue from absolutes to hide the anemic quality of your position. There are no absolutes. Presuming them is stupid.
Nobodies talking about "enemies" or a militarily defensive wall. Illegal immigrants a foot walking into America and planting themselves.
How is pointing out the failure of the Great Wall a "absolute"?
I will not bother trying to explain to you, again, why arguing from presumed absolutes is stupid.
well my point was that the wall did fail. Then provided links and evidence of when it failed. Then you just say "oh absolute!" without explaining. But ok! :thumbs:
"....the Great Wall failed to stop enemies, including in 1644
And also using criminal labor, slave labor. And the wall ultimately failed.
We already have a vast fence.
Really? How so. Border patrol budget has constantly been on the rise, and so have immigration and customs enforcement. We are constantly putting more and more money into it. How much is enough?
How is pointing out the failure of the Great Wall a "absolute"?
Ecofarm would argue with you if you said the sun was hot. :lamo
The better option is to eliminate the welfare state. Few will come if all have to work.