Time will tell if she was wrong or not. But the way she explained it do not expect GM or GE or some other corporation to start denying certain types of contraceptives. They do not fall under this ruling.
Early voting in Georgia. On the 20th of October this old Goldwater conservative voted against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by casting my vote for Gary Johnson. Neither Trump or Clinton belong within a million miles of the Oval Office.
The most ridiculous objection statement goes to Ginsburg:
How a national "labor" law that exempts employers of up to 50 (now 100 under the latest Obama "wait until after the midterm election" tweak) employees is deemed to be "uniform compliance" in the first place is beyond insane. PPACA had no uniform employer mandate in the first place. I guess since progressive taxation is A-OK constitutionally then progressive labor laws are cool too - unless they contain conscientious objection provisions that rile up progressive justices.In a dissent she read aloud from the bench, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called the decision "potentially sweeping" because it minimizes the government's interest in uniform compliance with laws affecting the workplace. "And it discounts the disadvantages religion-based opt outs impose on others, in particular, employees who do not share their employer's religious beliefs," Ginsburg said.
“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists to adapt the world to himself.
Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman
This is a good one to start with...
Are you seriously THAT dishonest ?
Selective out of context quotes from a article that explicitly addresses the failure rates in reference to improper use is just dishonest.
I'm guessing Hobby Lobby vets their employees well enough to hire intelligent, people not morons.