I'm not a drama queen. You're claiming abortions will skyrocket, and now you're claiming that women lost access to birth control. Think about it. That's drama. Especially because neither statement is true.
Here's how the IRS defines "closely held corporation":
Has more than 50% of the value of its outstanding stock owned (directly or indirectly) by 5 or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of the tax year; and
Is not a personal service corporation.
Basically, "closely held" is a term that covers as much as 90 percent (or more) of all businesses, according to a 2000 study.
A LOT of people could be affected by the Supreme Court’s birth control decision — theoretically - The Washington Post
Killing one person is murder, killing 100,000 is foreign policy
But I'd assume the Hobby Lobby hourly workers and their dependents run the gamut from dirt poor to wealthy. What's your point?
As to the payroll tax issue: It seems to me that it is a direct payment to pay for their nationalized health insurance. Calling it a 'payroll tax' seems to me a bit convenient. But, that's fine, I doubt we will agree.
You can never be safe from a government that can keep you completely safe from each other and the world. You must choose.
And access is limited. You can't argue that taking away funding for something health care related doesn't affect functional access. If I said, you CAN have a heart transplant, that access would not mean much of you didn't have the 50 or 100K. Same here, just on a different scale.
A Canadian conservative is one who believes in limited government and that the government should stay out of our wallets and out of our bedrooms.