Just like if a Republican today suggested Democrats should get on board with the voter ID laws at polling places because a similar thing was a Democratic Idea before would, and should, be met with vitriol because it basically is selectively incapsulating a single segment of history years earlier in an effort to misrepresent reality as it relates to the time between then and now.
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
I see arguments here that people are being deprived of contraceptives. Huh? How? The court didn't ban them. No matter if they are covered or not, they still have to go to the store and get them. Cost is low, so that is not the issue. Government force and power over the people is the issue here.
"We have met the enemy and they are ours..." -- Oliver Hazard Perry
"I don't want a piece of you... I want the whole thing!" -- Bob Barker
Dude, just stop. Could you possibly be more misinformed? I mean seriously only libertarians and other right wingers work or contribute to society. Get over angry right wing radio talking point self. I've worked all my life and paid my share of taxes.
Not that it's any of your ****ing business, but my oldest will graduate from nursing school from a major university in June. She's not done, as she wants to become a nurse practitioner which requires a masters. The youngest is also headed to a similar university this fall. She too will enter medical school. So spare me your rhetorical right wing condescending nonsense.
Have you already taught them how to use an EBT card?
Really dude? For the record, I haven't ever had the misfortune of having to use an EBT card. I know lots of good people that had to do so. And, some of them were conservatives. Life happens. Companies close, people get sick, etc. I am damned glad that resource is there in the event one needs it. Just like unemployment. It's an important program. Whether you see the greater need for it or not.
In lala liberal land if you don't pay for something a liberal feels they have a right to despite the fact that they are still perfectly free to obtain it by paying for it themselves, you are violating their rights. In essence, any refusal to subsidize a liberal's lifestyle in any respect it constitutes a violation of their rights. How pathetic.
This is what passes for logic on the left these days and the fact that so many buy into this logic is further proof that this nation is just circling the drain.
Last edited by DB20; 06-30-14 at 01:08 PM.
What does Hobby Lobby has to do with birth control and Obamacare?
Look, I have a major problem with this ruling from the standpoint that I find it difficult to define a "corporation" as having First Amendment Rights. I understand how the SCOTUS came to this decision by stating that a closely held privately owned corporation is difficult to separate from the owners... I get that. What I don't get, is how this may effect the corporate veil that exists in other issues, if at all. The only part of this ruling that allows me to understand the ruling's foundation, is the part where there cannot be a reasonable alternative; for instance, a tax does not have an alternative - everyone has to pay taxes, and since there exists a number of reasonable alternatives to these four forms of contraception, the government did not have the Constitutional power to force this singular means as a mandate without alternatives for the company.
Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!