• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court Strikes Down Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones

Get back to me on what a victory of freedom of speech is when these entitled robe-wearers strike down any buffer between the public screaming and threatening them inches from their faces while they fear being murdered by similar insane harassers.

Freedom is not for the faint of heart.:peace
 
I generally prefer to close with something. As a child of the sixties, :peace is comfortable.

So do you have it on a quick-click...thing...or something? Did you program a shortcut key? I'm just curious because by the tenth time I would get completely bored of it.
 
Get back to me on what a victory of freedom of speech is when these entitled robe-wearers strike down any buffer between the public screaming and threatening them inches from their faces while they fear being murdered by similar insane harassers.
Spare us rob. IIRC you were all for the bussed in thugs harassing the 15 yo son of a banker during the failed OWS crap.
 
So do you have it on a quick-click...thing...or something? Did you program a shortcut key? I'm just curious because by the tenth time I would get completely bored of it.

Each post is entirely hand crafted.:peace
 
Each post is entirely hand crafted.:peace

That's awesome. In an age where everything is automated I respect when somebody takes the time to do each thing individually.

I still adblocked it, though.
 
Spare us rob. IIRC you were all for the bussed in thugs harassing the 15 yo son of a banker during the failed OWS crap.

Was I?
 
Twelve years in Africa, six in Europe, nearly 34 altogether.

Then you should have no such problems with regards to people's privacy as a sincere and large peace of what is called freedom. why are you so faint hearted about the freedom of privacy?
 
Then you should have no such problems with regards to people's privacy as a sincere and large peace of what is called freedom. why are you so faint hearted about the freedom of privacy?

Because I think free speech is more important for the health of our Republic.
 
Because I think free speech is more important for the health of our Republic.

As I just pointed out, you don't care much for privacy. I should be able to blast my stereo outside of your house then. Its my freedom of speech... or do you deserve privacy?

You want one right of freedom to suppress others' rights of freedom. Harassment is harassment. Doing ill unto others... suppressing others. That's you defining your version of "freedom".
 
As I just pointed out, you don't care much for privacy. I should be able to blast my stereo outside of your house then. Its my freedom of speech... or do you deserve privacy?

You want one right of freedom to suppress others' rights of freedom. Harassment is harassment. Doing ill unto others... suppressing others. That's you defining your version of "freedom".

No need for you to invent arguments for me. I can take care of that myself. Your stereo has nothing to do with my privacy. Blast it wherever you want (except on my property). Of course, you may be cited for creating a public nuisance, but that's another part of the law.:peace
 
No need for you to invent arguments for me. I can take care of that myself. Your stereo has nothing to do with my privacy. Blast it wherever you want (except on my property). Of course, you may be cited for creating a public nuisance, but that's another part of the law.:peace

public nuisance... when it's about you then you seem to care about individuals' rights to not be harassed. interesting.
 
public nuisance... when it's about you then you seem to care about individuals' rights to not be harassed. interesting.

Well, no. A public nuisance would by definition be an annoyance to many. Nothing could be less relevant to the point about free speech in advocacy regarding public issues. You're being childish.:peace
 
Funny to hear americans talk about free speech zones when the whole ****ing country is a free speech zone.

Indeed. I suspect the concept of a "free speech zone" would not pass muster before the SCOTUS for just that reason.:peace
 
The legal definition doesn't mention standing on a side-walk or "protesting."

That's because the two are not related. Protesting is protesting, not harassment.
 
That's because the two are not related. Protesting is protesting, not harassment.

Unless it is harassment, as per the legal definition of harassment. Do you need me to repost it again?
 
Unless it is harassment, as per the legal definition of harassment. Do you need me to repost it again?

You can post it all day long....but free speech is free speech and protesting is protesting.
 
I think so...so I think you're selective outrage only highlights the hypocrisy of you're argument now. Don't feel bad though it's not just you, many liberals share your proclivity for selective outrage...hell, many repub's the same. Maybe it's politics. But it doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out.
 
You can post it all day long....but free speech is free speech and protesting is protesting.

Then we've come to the same point that I've reached with another poster.

1)Is harassment a thing?
2)What is harassment?
3)When does protest cross over into harassment?
 
I think so...so I think you're selective outrage only highlights the hypocrisy of you're argument now. Don't feel bad though it's not just you, many liberals share your proclivity for selective outrage...hell, many repub's the same. Maybe it's politics. But it doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out.

I don't recall posting about owe here sooooo what you claim to "think so" is more like you trying to get personal without actually knowing anything about who you are talking to.
 
I don't recall posting about owe here sooooo what you claim to "think so" is more like you trying to get personal without actually knowing anything about who you are talking to.
Bwhaaaa! Yes. Stick with that. ;) maybe you missed the part of my last post that said both sides do it and such? Ah well, carry on :roll:
 
Bwhaaaa! Yes. Stick with that. ;) maybe you missed the part of my last post that said both sides do it and such? Ah well, carry on :roll:

That's what I thought. You went after me personally, fabricating my stance... and now you admit you lied. Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom