• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Gay marriage wins in Indiana and Utah

Support what? The sissification of America, gay days at Disney, forcing gay marriage, forcing gay adoption, forcing the military to accept gays, screaming intolerance to anyone that don't agree with you. You mean THAT agenda?

Disney is a private company and can do what they want. Why do you hate their freedom?
You aren't being forced to marry a man.
You aren't being forced to adopt, or not adopt, anyone.
Why don't you think a gay person is good enough to fight and die for the country and freedom they love

Absolutely nothing is being forced upon you. Two men are getting married. You aren't involved.
 
It's not the rights of the people to vote on the issue, since we already know...and the decisions are based on....discrimination. And we already know that the states cannot vote to restrict rights guaranteed in the Constitution, such as being discriminated on based on gender.

Anything else?

Why not read the thread instead of simply rehashing and reasking stuff that's been thoroughly covered already?
 
Why not read the thread instead of simply rehashing and reasking stuff that's been thoroughly covered already?

Funny, Deuce keeps asking too. Apparently we missed it.

Can you provide some post numbers?
 
Why not read the thread instead of simply rehashing and reasking stuff that's been thoroughly covered already?

You haven't contributed anything new in any of these threads so I wouldn't talk about rehashing.
 
You haven't contributed anything new in any of these threads so I wouldn't talk about rehashing.

There is nothing new about the issue. Gays want to get married and are using the courts to get their way. And be damned if you object.
 
There is nothing new about the issue. Gays want to get married and are using the courts to get their way. And be damned if you object.

That's right because you have no right to prevent them from entering into a legal arrangement, legal kinship agreement than in no way harms you or affects your marriage unless you willing allow it to. There is no legitimate state interest furthered by not allowing same sex couples to get married.
 
Support what? The sissification of America, gay days at Disney, forcing gay marriage, forcing gay adoption, forcing the military to accept gays, screaming intolerance to anyone that don't agree with you. You mean THAT agenda?

It is funny how Conservatives like you (speaking of sissification) like to view yourselves as the rough and ready manly men of American, but yet you climb the wall like a scared cat at the thought of the "GAyzzzzzzzzz"
 
That's right because you have no right to prevent them from entering into a legal arrangement, legal kinship agreement than in no way harms you or affects your marriage unless you willing allow it to. There is no legitimate state interest furthered by not allowing same sex couples to get married.

I could say that about people that want to marry their pets.
 
Sounds like other social issues where corporations are using the courts to get their way--Hobby Lobby.
What's good for the goose ...
There is nothing new about the issue. Gays want to get married and are using the courts to get their way. And be damned if you object.
 
There is nothing new about the issue. Gays want to get married and are using the courts to get their way. And be damned if you object.

You have yet to demonstrate any way anyone is 'damned' or harmed at all.

Blacks and women used the courts to 'get their way too.' It's called equality under the law, civil rights.
 
It is funny how Conservatives like you (speaking of sissification) like to view yourselves as the rough and ready manly men of American, but yet you climb the wall like a scared cat at the thought of the "GAyzzzzzzzzz"

Don't get it twisted, nothing about them "scares" me. Another part of the gay agenda, attempts at ridicule for your beliefs.
 
Sounds like other social issues where corporations are using the courts to get their way--Hobby Lobby.
What's good for the goose ...

Clearly you don't know much about the Hobby Lobby SC decision.
 
You have yet to demonstrate any way anyone is 'damned' or harmed at all.

Blacks and women used the courts to 'get their way too.' It's called equality under the law, civil rights.

Oh, and the "civil rights" tie in. Why? Oh, yea because the issue cant stand on its own.
 
attempts at ridicule for your beliefs.

That's because your beliefs are ridicule worthy.

You have presented nothing in this thread of any gravitas or value, it's simply you own, bigoted views that have no place in reality.

So yeah...
 
That's because your beliefs are ridicule worthy.

You have presented nothing in this thread of any gravitas or value, it's simply you own, bigoted views that have no place in reality.

So yeah...
Speaking of ridicule worthy. You provide nothing to try to make a person think differently, only attack them and push them further into their beliefs. Good job.
 
It is funny how Conservatives like you (speaking of sissification) like to view yourselves as the rough and ready manly men of American, but yet you climb the wall like a scared cat at the thought of the "GAyzzzzzzzzz"

"Sissification", because masculine is good and feminine is bad, right?
 
Speaking of ridicule worthy.
You provide nothing to try to make a person think differently, only attack them and push them further into their beliefs. Good job.
You described yourself perfecdtly--takes one to know one .
 
Oh, and the "civil rights" tie in. Why? Oh, yea because the issue cant stand on its own.

What issue should it stand on then? It is a civil rights issue....what else should the courts base it on? Your religious beliefs? Your opinion?

Seems like the Constitution would be the correct guide......
 
Speaking of ridicule worthy. You provide nothing to try to make a person think differently, only attack them and push them further into their beliefs. Good job.

LOL Now you're the victim? ha ha ha

People have provided dozens of constructive reasons and examples. You were not able to provide any harm or 'lifestyle' examples or any reason besides your personal opinion to deny people their civil rights.

It's been explained how it's a civil rights issue, compared to blacks and women, and you choose to completely disregard it, not even attempt to show why.

Hey....you used 'sissification' of America as a REASON :lamo And you object to 'ridicule worthy?'
 
LOL Now you're the victim? ha ha ha

People have provided dozens of constructive reasons and examples. You were not able to provide any harm or 'lifestyle' examples or any reason besides your personal opinion to deny people their civil rights.

It's been explained how it's a civil rights issue, compared to blacks and women, and you choose to completely disregard it, not even attempt to show why.

Hey....you used 'sissification' of America as a REASON :lamo And you object to 'ridicule worthy?'
Not a victim at all. I do disregard it because its apples and oranges.
 
What issue should it stand on then? It is a civil rights issue....what else should the courts base it on? Your religious beliefs? Your opinion?

Seems like the Constitution would be the correct guide......
It shouldn't stand on any issue. Marriage is a man and a woman.
 
It shouldn't stand on any issue. Marriage is a man and a woman.

That is your opinion, nothing more. An opinion that hopefully in another 10 years will be dead. Cheers to SSM being legalized in all states and people like you having to either deal with it or leave the country.
 
Back
Top Bottom