• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Cochran wins

You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.

So again, pay attention to what was said and not to what you wanted to have been said.



And that 8300 hundred is only out of what they were allowed to look at.

Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records

[...]

State Sen. Chris McDaniel is trying to prove that some people who voted in the June 24 runoff also voted in the June 3 Democratic primary, which would be illegal. His goal is to force another runoff.

On Monday, he asked the court for an emergency order forcing Harrison County Circuit Clerk Gayle Parker to let him see original copies of poll books.

[...]

Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records




Miss. high court seeks more info from McDaniel
He has a claim that is being entertained, let the courts figure it out.


As for your juvenile "Get on with your life" comment. :doh That clearly is what you need to do.

I provided an update to that which some find interesting.
And while you may want to be (as displayed by your behavior), you are not the arbiter of what gets posted, or of what others find interesting. So yeah, your own words apply more to you than to me.
I think what he's saying is that since Cochran won by about 8000 votes, unless the vast majority of the ~8500 questionable votes are actually thrown out, it won't matter.
 
I think the only real way to deal with this is simply for Mcdaniel to run a write in campaign. The truth will come out when Mcdaniel gets more Republican votes than Cockran. The black Democrats would vote for the Dem so he would not get the votes he would have got in the runoff. This corrupt GOP establishment needs to be taught a lesson even if it means losing a Senate seat. To be honest considering the pathetic job this President has done I still think the GOP will retake the Senate. Maybe we can get lucky with a twofer & bring down Mconnell as well.
 
Last edited:
You do realize that "tea bagger" was actually coined by members of the tea party movement? It was only after members of the liberal press had fun with the name that thae red-faced tea partiers tried deflect and sell us on the notion that the libs made up the name. Want to see a hundred pictures of tea parties wearing tea bags and holding declaring themselves "tea-baggers"?
images.jpg
They wore tea bags on their hats ... so they called themselves teabaggers.
They were too naive to get the sexual reference until it was too late.
 
You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.

So again, pay attention to what was said and not to what you wanted to have been said.



And that 8300 hundred is only out of what they were allowed to look at.

Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records

[...]

State Sen. Chris McDaniel is trying to prove that some people who voted in the June 24 runoff also voted in the June 3 Democratic primary, which would be illegal. His goal is to force another runoff.

On Monday, he asked the court for an emergency order forcing Harrison County Circuit Clerk Gayle Parker to let him see original copies of poll books.

[...]

Chris McDaniel Asks Mississippi Court To Open Poll Records




Miss. high court seeks more info from McDaniel
He has a claim that is being entertained, let the courts figure it out.


As for your juvenile "Get on with your life" comment. :doh That clearly is what you need to do.

I provided an update to that which some find interesting.
And while you may want to be (as displayed by your behavior), you are not the arbiter of what gets posted, or of what others find interesting. So yeah, your own words apply more to you than to me.

I understand the word "if".... and, as used in this case, the word "if" is of such low probability as to be almost non-sensical. The chance of ALL 8,300 ballots being of error and being thrown out is almost 'nil" He just doesn't have a enough "questionable" ballots to have any case. In fact, the low number of those "questionable" ballots vis-a-vis the vote differential is a great argument for the validation of the election.
 
I don't regard as "naïve" those who aren't up on the trendy sexual references. Speaks to the juvenility of those who seized on the "teabagger" thing. Maybe it's even a virtue not knowing what a donkey punch or dirty sanchez is. ;)
 
I understand the word "if".... and, as used in this case, the word "if" is of such low probability as to be almost non-sensical. The chance of ALL 8,300 ballots being of error and being thrown out is almost 'nil" He just doesn't have a enough "questionable" ballots to have any case. In fact, the low number of those "questionable" ballots vis-a-vis the vote differential is a great argument for the validation of the election.
Even so it should not be swept under the rug. Someone should be investigating the accusations by a black pastor that he and many others were actually paid to go vote for Cochran. Not to mention the Race baiting ads that were perpetrated by Henry Barbour who was doing the Republican establishments bidding here.
 
I don't regard as "naïve" those who aren't up on the trendy sexual references. Speaks to the juvenility of those who seized on the "teabagger" thing. Maybe it's even a virtue not knowing what a donkey punch or dirty sanchez is. ;)
What's a "dirty sanchez"?
What's a "donkey punch"?
 
I think what he's saying is that since Cochran won by about 8000 votes, unless the vast majority of the ~8500 questionable votes are actually thrown out, it won't matter.
What he is saying is irrelevant to that which he replied.
I clearly indicated "if". I pointed that out how many times?


And no, Cochran did not win by 8000 votes. He supposedly won by less than 7700 votes.
McDaniel hasn't completed a review of all the ballots, so what he finally comes up with may be much more than 8300 irregularities he now claims.

So ...
1.) His ballot review is not complete.
2.) He has not challenged the election.





You clearly are confused, and obviously didn't understand the simple word of "if", because if the 8300 hundred are "actual questionable ballots," then yes it is sufficient number to force another run-off. Or in the alternative, Cochran can concede.
I understand the word "if".... and, as used in this case, the word "if" is of such low probability as to be almost non-sensical. The chance of ALL 8,300 ballots being of error and being thrown out is almost 'nil" He just doesn't have a enough "questionable" ballots to have any case. In fact, the low number of those "questionable" ballots vis-a-vis the vote differential is a great argument for the validation of the election.
You obviously didn't understand the "if" as presented. Because if those are "actual questionable ballots," he has more than enough to force another run-off.
 
Back
Top Bottom