- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,111
- Reaction score
- 1,605
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Exactly. To sum it up, if what was really being sold was information, then the app would fail. A person would sell the information that they are now leaving their parking space, and then they would leave. If the buyer doesn't get there in time, too bad. Good luck surviving with an app like that.Of course it doesn't. He's been trying to sneak around what the law says on this matter through the entire thread. He actually tried to claim that laws against advertising the sale/use of public property pertained to people who physically place ads and not internet based advertisement. He's probably a shrill for the company and was expecting people on this forum to actually buy the bull**** claim that what is being transferred for information. If information was what was being transferred, there wouldn't be a need for payment after the parking spot has been taken over from the person who placed the advertisement for it in the first place.What is being paid for is access to spot, not the information for it.
The very act of holding the space and then leaving only once someone pays you makes this far more than simple information transfer.