OT but I'd like to know how many of the ones who agree with this legal decision over someone being "offended" have scoffed, screached, and berated at any posters who have said that certain things "offend" them, such as books, songs, women breastfeeding in public restaurants displaying nipples, and so on. I'll go out on a limb and say "a lot".
I'd direct you to Hatuey's links, but there are too many of them. Suffice to say, he disagrees with my opinion but he was "benevolent" and welcomed me back into the thread.
I'll remind you of this post the next time someone posts about something that he is "offended" by and you aren't. I'm sure you'll be just as considerate of someone on the right being "offended" as you are of these 5 people and champion abolishing what "offends" them.
Anti-Democracy advocate, Mixed government is the only good government
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this mixed Constitution.
I missed the posts that declare that someone should "not be allowed to speak". Can you point to those posts?
By the way, I'm not the poster who posted about the PC Police, but reading that post and applying it to this story, the PC Police in question were the federal judges, not the posters on this board.