Proof that he's tyrannical? It's the same sort of fact you deal in - my opinion. The only way to prove that is if he were already impeached. And abandoning his oath of office is a high crime. The Constitution does not support this grant, especially where he's already been told no by Congress.
But he's continuing to rack up the things he could be impeached for.
See above. I doubt "you'll" agree, but that isn't my choice for posting this.3.) again youll have to give me examples you may be 100% right but this isnt one of them as far as impact/precedence
And that makes it right?4.) the stage as been there since EOs have been around this is nothing new and its legal. if obama id ZERO EOs nothing would change the next pres could STILL do them????
2.) I agree there have been EOs that do not function the way I "think" EOs are supposed to but again this sint one of them
3.) but i did agree partially just not for this particular EO because theres no reason too
4.) nope never implied that once only said this is nothing new like people said and this particular EO isnt wrong in anyway.
If BAD EOs are to be discussed thats fin by me, if the EO process is to be discussed thats fine by me. Thats not the thread topic and this EO is fine and legal and doesnt overstep any boundaries.