Yea right. Pot meet kettle.
You guys have been covering for Obama and the Democrats on every issue including Benghazi and the IRS scandal.
I can understand a disagreement on policy, but when you people willfully ignore and attempt to divert away from something as profoundly corrupt as the IRSs targeting of American Citizens you've traded away your integrity for a membership in the Barrack Obama fan club.
Nancy Pelosi said: “We have to pass it, to find out what’s in it.” A Doctor called to a radio show & said: "That's the definition of a stool sample"
"Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket," Barack Obama January 2008
Have you even admitted that there was a purposeful and HIGHLY illegal targeting of Conservatives by the IRS ?
Because of you haven't then my post is accurate.
So what, we don't have documents that tie the WH directly to the IRS scandal, but do we really need them by now ?
What has been Obama's continued position on this issue ? Well aside from his iniatal false outrage.
Why hasn't the Justice department gone after these people ?
And you still continue to defend the President and the corruption that is the Democrat party.
Ideology over truth. FFS, Lerner admitted there was disproportionate targeting.
She LIED and blamed it on " rogue agents in Cincinnati ".
Now if the IRS wasn't targeting American Citizens based on their opposition to the President why would she have to concoct some BS lie about " rogue agents " ?
With recent revelations about what is obvious to the most simple of minds is destruction of evidence, only the fully controlled can wave a hand and try to sell a "nothing to see here" meme.
Keep waving, it's not helping your agenda.
To her Wall Street owners: Hillary Clinton: “But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. so, you need both a public and a private position.” - Hillary Clinton: "I'm kind of far removed from the struggles of the Middle Class"
Uh huh, pretty selective of you.
Using that statement out of context is a perfect example of what I'm taking about.
Again, what has been his position since Lois Lerner admitted to the targeting of Conservative Americans ?
What has his Justice department done since Lerner admitted there was disproportionate targeting ?